The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Null multipole particles as sources of pp-waves
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These are localized on the spherical wavefront and, following [1,11,12], can naturally be considered as null point sources of the impulsive gravitational wave.”
From Impulsive waves in electrovac direct product spacetimes with (2002) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Aichelburg, 1971, Gen. Rel. Grav., 2, 303, 10.1007/BF00758149 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferrari, 1990, Gen. Rel. Grav., 22, 1105, 10.1007/BF00759012 · DOI
- Loustó, 1992, Nucl. Phys. B, 383, 377, 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90683-3 · DOI
- Balasin, 1995, Class. Quantum Grav., 12, 707, 10.1088/0264-9381/12/3/009 · DOI
- Balasin, 1996, Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 731, 10.1088/0264-9381/13/4/013 · DOI
Cited by
Impulsive waves in electrovac direct product spacetimes with
Ortaggio, M., & Podolsk, J. (2002) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/20/313 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, J. B., & Podolský, J.
- Venue
- Physics Letters A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 8-10
- ISSN
- 0375-9601
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
