A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The consistency ratio CR is interpreted as a continuous reliability signal; lower CR values indicate stronger internal agreement and higher confidence in structured evaluation.
“Beyond binary filtering, we further interpret the CR as a continuous reliability signal [16,24]. Lower CR values indicate stronger internal agreement among pairwise comparisons and thus higher confidence in the structured evaluation.”
From Structured Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Large Language Models with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and DualJudge (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain
Saarijärvi, H., Kuusela, H., & Spence, M. T. (2012) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.031 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
He, Y., Smirnov, I., Fedrushkov, D., Kovalchuk, S., & Revin, I. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03742
“…logarithmic deviation from their transitive estimates are locally adjusted while preserving the reciprocity condition: The repair strategy is heuristic and performs a limited number of local corrections within a single repair phase rather than iteratively optimizing the entire matrix[3,24].”
- Authors
- Zeshui, X., & Cuiping, W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 443-449
- ISSN
- 0377-2217
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
