The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the nutritive value of kudzu (Pueraria lobata) as a feed for ruminants
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“kudzu is considered one of the most invasive weed species in the United States, with an estimated coverage of 810,000 ha (C orley et al. 1997).”
From Kudzu (Pueraria montana) community responses to herbicides, burning, and high-density loblolly pine (2003) · cites this paper as Corley et al. 1997
Citations
Cites
Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. the composition and output of sheep’s saliva.
McDougall, E. I. (1948) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj0430099 · Cited by 1,970
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Massey, 1946, Preliminary report of green grazing versus hays for fattening swine, University System of Georgia, Circular 152, 1
- Mertens, 1980, The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro, J. Dairy Sci., 63, 1437, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83101-8 · DOI
- Piper, 1920, Kudzu, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, Circular, 89, 1
- Polk, 1945, Kudzu in the ration of growing chicks, Mississippi State College, Miss. Bull., 414, 1
- Sturkie, 1939, Kudzu; its value and use in Alabama, Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Circular, 83, 1
- Tilley, 1963, A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops, J. Br. Grassl. Soc., 10, 104, 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x · DOI
- Van Soest, 1991, Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition, J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Von Keyserlingk, 1996, Degradability characteristics of dry matter and crude protein of forages in ruminants, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 57, 291, 10.1016/0377-8401(95)00865-9 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kudzu (Pueraria montana) community responses to herbicides, burning, and high-density loblolly pine
Harrington, T. B., Rader-Dixon, L. T., & Taylor, J. W. (2003) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/02-142 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Corley, R. N., Woldeghebriel, A., & Murphy, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Tuskegee University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Murphy, M.R.
- ORCID
- Murphy, M.R.
- Venue
- Animal Feed Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 183-188
- ISSN
- 0377-8401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010256870
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Feed Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Keywords
- Pueraria lobata, ruminant feed, nutritional value, forage chemical composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, crude protein, tubers, alfalfa hay, bermudagrass hay, mineral content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
