The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extracellular polymeric substances responsible for bacterial adhesion onto solid surface
Abstract
The influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on bacterial cell adhesion onto solid surfaces was investigated using 27 heterotrophic bacterial strains isolated from a wastewater treatment reactor. Cell adhesion onto glass beads was carried out by the packed-bed method and the results were discussed in terms of the amount of each EPS component produced and cell surface characteristics such as zeta potential and hydrophobicity. Protein and polysaccharides accounted for 75-89% of the EPS composition, indicating that they are the major EPS components. Among the polysaccharides, the amounts of hexose, hexosamine and ketose were relatively high in EPS-rich strains. For EPS-poor strains, the efficiency of cell adhesion onto glass beads increased as the absolute values of zeta potential decreased, suggesting that electrostatic interaction suppresses cell adhesion efficiency. On the other hand, the amounts of hexose and pentose exhibited good correlations with cell adhesiveness for EPS-rich strains, indicating that polymeric interaction due to the EPS covering on the cell surface promoted cell adhesion. It was concluded that, if the EPS amount is relatively small, cell adhesion onto solid surfaces is inhibited by electrostatic interaction, and if it is relatively large, cell adhesion is enhanced by polymeric interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion
van Loosdrecht, M. C., Lyklema, J., Norde, W., Schraa, G., & Zehnder, A. J. (1987) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.53.8.1893-1897.1987 · Cited by 959
What are Bacterial Extracellular Polymeric Substances?
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R., & Flemming, H.-C. (1999) · Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60147-7_1 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Li, X. Y., & Yang, S. F. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.037 · Cited by 2,096
Badireddy, A. R., Chellam, S., Gassman, P. L., Engelhard, M. H., Lea, A. S., & Rosso, K. M. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.024 · Cited by 538
The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses
Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E. W. (2023) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8 · Cited by 404
D’Abzac, P., Bordas, F., Van Hullebusch, E., Lens, P. N. L., & Guibaud, G. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2288-x · Cited by 337
Das, T., Sehar, S., & Manefield, M. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12085 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuneda, S., Aikawa, H., Hayashi, H., Yuasa, A., & Hirata, A.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Letters
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-292
- ISSN
- 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6968
- OpenAlex
- W2013246580
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracellular polymeric substances responsible for bacterial adhesion onto solid surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00399-9
- The paper
- Tsuneda, S., Aikawa, H., Hayashi, H., Yuasa, A., & Hirata, A. (2003). Extracellular polymeric substances responsible for bacterial adhesion onto solid surface. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00399-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.