Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures

Lugo, Ariel E·1997·Forest Ecology and Management

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00191-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Abbott, I., 1989. The influence of fauna on soil structure. In: J.D. Majer (Editor), Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Animals in Reclaimed Lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 449–515.
  2. Anderson, M., 1987. The effects of forest plantations on some lowland soils. I. A second sampling of nutrient stock. Forestry, 60: 69–85. · doi:10.1093/forestry/60.1.69
  3. Armstrong, A.J. and van Hensbergen, H.J., 1996. Impacts of afforestation with pines on assemblages of native biota in South Africa. S. Afr. For. J., 175: 35–42. · DOI
  4. Armstrong, A.J., van Hensbergen, H.J., Scott, D.F. and Milton, S.J., 1996. Are pine plantations `inhospitable seas' around remnant native habitat within south-western Cape forestry areas? S. Afr. For. J., 176: 1–9. · doi:10.1080/00382167.1996.9629703
  5. Barrow, C.J., 1991. Land Degradation: Development and Breakdown of Terrestrial Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 295 pp.
  6. Berger, J.J., 1993. Ecological restoration and nonindigenous plant species: a review. Rest. Ecol., 1: 74–82. · DOI
  7. Bernhard-Reversat, F., 1988. Soil nitrogen mineralization under a Eucalyptus plantation and natural Acacia forest in Senegal. For. Ecol. Manage., 23: 233–244. · DOI
  8. Birdsey, R.A. and Weaver, P.L., 1987. Forest Area Trends in Puerto Rico. Research Note SO-331. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, 59 pp. · doi:10.2737/so-rn-331
  9. Bowen, G.D. and Nambiar, E.K.S. (Editors), 1984. Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, New York, 516 pp.
  10. Bradshaw, A.D., 1987. The reclamation of derelict land and the ecology of ecosystems. In: W.R. Jordan, M.E. Gilpin and J.D. Aber (Editors), Restoration Ecology: a Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53–74.
  11. Bradshaw, A.D., 1993. Restoration ecology as a science. Rest. Ecol., 1: 71–73. · DOI
  12. Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E., 1990. Tropical secondary forests. J. Trop. Ecol., 6: 1–32. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E., 1994. Rehabilitation of tropical lands: a key to sustaining development. Rest. Ecol., 2: 97–111. · DOI
  14. Buschbacher, R., Uhl, C. and Serrão, E.A.S., 1992. Reforestation of degraded amazon pasture lands. In: M.K. Wali (Editor), Ecosystem Rehabilitation: Ecosystem Analysis and Synthesis. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 257–274.
  15. Butterfield, R.P., 1996. Early species selection for tropical reforestation: a consideration of stability. For. Ecol. Manage., 81: 161–168. · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(95)03649-0
  16. Cairns, J., Jr., 1993. Is restoration ecology practical? Rest. Ecol., 1: 3–7. · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1993.tb00003.x
  17. Cohen, A.L., Singhakumara, B.M.P. and Ashton, P.M.S., 1995. Releasing rain forest succession: a case study in the Dicranopteris linearis fernlands of Sri Lanka. Rest. Ecol., 3: 261–270. · DOI
  18. Cruz, A., 1988. Avian resource use in a Caribbean pine plantation. J. Wild. Manage., 52: 274–279. · doi:10.2307/3801234
  19. Cuevas, E., Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E., 1991. Above- and below-ground organic matter storage and production in a tropical pine plantation and a paired broadleaf secondary forest. Plant Soil, 135: 257–268. · DOI
  20. Dale, V.H., Houghton, R.H., Grainger, A., Lugo, A.E. and Brown, S., 1993. Emissions of greenhouse gases from tropical deforestation and subsequent uses of the land. In: R.R. Harwood, M.E. Carter, R. Gomaz, S.P. Gliessman, A. Gómez-Pompa, L.S. Hardin, W.A. Hill, R. Lal, G. Levine, A.E. Lugo, A.G. Power, V.W. Ruttan, P.A. Sánchez, E.A. Serrão and P.C. Wright (Editors), Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 215–260.
  21. Evans, J., 1992. Plantation Forestry in the Tropics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 402 pp.
  22. Ewel, J.J., 1980. Tropical succession: manifold routes to maturity. Biotropica, 12 (Suppl.): 2–7. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ewel, J.J., 1986. Invasibility: lessons from south Florida. In: H.A. Mooney and J.A. Drake (Editors), Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 214–230. · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4988-7_13
  24. Fimbel, R.A. and Fimbel, C.C., 1996. The role of exotic conifer plantations in rehabilitating degraded tropical forest lands: a case study from the Kibale Forest in Uganda. For. Ecol. Manage., 81: 215–226. · DOI
  25. Francis, J.K., 1995. Forest plantation in Puerto Rico. In: A.E. Lugo and C. Lowe (Editors), Tropical Forests: Management and Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 210–223. · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2498-3_8
  26. Fu, S., Rodrı́guez Pedraza, C. and Lugo, A.E., 1997. A twelve-year comparison of stand changes in a mahogany plantation and a paired natural forest of similar age. Biotropica, 28, in press. · doi:10.2307/2389093
  27. Garcı́a Montiel, D. and Scatena, F.N., 1994. The effect of human activity on the structure and composition of a tropical forest in Puerto Rico. For. Ecol. Manage., 63: 57–78. · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90246-1
  28. Gómez-Pompa, A. and Vázquez-Yanes, C., 1974. Studies on secondary succession of tropical lowlands: the life cycle of secondary species. In: A.J. Cave, H. Iwaki, S.C. Pandeya, G.F. Weetman, J.F. Franklin, C.O. Tamm, G.E. Likens, F.H. Bormann, J.H.A. Boerboom, R. Freson, G. Goffinet and F. Malaisse (Editors), Proceedings of the First International Congress of Ecology. The Hague, pp. 336–342.
  29. Grainger, A., 1988. Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover. Int. Tree Crops J., 5: 31–61. · DOI
  30. Guariguata, M.R., Rheingans, R. and Montagnini, F., 1995. Early woody invasion under tree plantations in Costa Rica: implications for forest restoration. Rest. Ecol., 3: 252–261. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Harwood, R.R., Carter, M.E., Gomaz, R., Gliessman, S.P., Gómez-Pompa, A., Hardin, L.S., Hill, W.A., Lal, R., Levine, G., Lugo, A.E., Power, A.G., Ruttan, V.W., Sánchez, P.A., Serrão, E.A. and Wright, P.C., 1993. Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 702 pp.
  32. Haselwandter, K. and Bowen, G.D., 1996. Mycorrhizal relations in trees for agroforestry and land rehabilitation. For. Ecol. Manage., 81: 1–17. · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(95)03661-x
  33. Heywood, V.H. and Watson, R.T. (Editors), 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment. United Nations Environmental Programme and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1140 pp.
  34. Hughes, C.E. and Styles, B.T., 1987. The benefits and potential risks of woody legume introductions. Int. Tree Crop J., 4: 209–247. · doi:10.1080/01435698.1987.9752826
  35. Kadeba, O., 1994. Growth and nutrient accumulation by Pinus caribaea on three savanna sites in northern Nigeria. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 49: 139–147. · doi:10.1016/0167-8809(94)90004-3
  36. Knabe, W., 1965. Observations on world-wide efforts to reclaim industrial waste land. In: G.T. Goodman, R.W. Edwards and J.M. Lambert (Editors), Ecology and the Industrial Society. Wiley, New York, pp. 263–296.
  37. Lugo, A.E., 1988a. Estimating reductions in the diversity of tropical forest species. In: E.O. Wilson and F.M. Peter (Editors), Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 58–70.
  38. Lugo, A.E., 1988b. The future of the forest. Ecosystem rehabilitation in the tropics. Environment, 30: 16–20 and 41–45. · DOI
  39. Lugo, A.E., 1992a. Tree plantations for rehabilitating damaged forest lands in the tropics. In: M.K. Wali (Editor), Ecosystem Rehabilitation: Ecosystem Analysis and Synthesis. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 247–255.
  40. Lugo, A.E., 1994a. Maintaining an open mind on exotic species. In: G.K. Meffe and R.C. Carroll (Editors), Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 218–220.
  41. Lugo, A.E., 1994b. Management of tropical biodiversity. Ecol. Appl., 5: 956–961. · DOI
  42. Lugo, A.E. and Brown, S., 1996. Management of land and species richness in the tropics. In: R.C. Szaro and D.W. Johnson (Editors), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes, Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 280–295.
  43. Lugo, A.E., Brown, S. and Chapman, J., 1988. An analytical review of production rates and stemwood biomass of tropical forest plantations. For. Ecol. Manage., 23: 179–200. · DOI
  44. Lugo, A.E., Cuevas, E. and Sánchez, M.J., 1990a. Nutrients and mass in litter and top soil of ten tropical tree plantations. Plant Soil, 125: 263–280. · DOI
  45. Lugo, A.E., Wang, D. and Bormann, F.H., 1990b. A comparative analysis of biomass production in five tropical tree species. For. Ecol. Manage., 31: 153–166. · DOI
  46. Majer, J.D. (Editor), 1989a. Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Animals in Reclaimed Lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 547 pp.
  47. Majer, J.D., 1989b. Fauna studies and land reclamation technology – a review of the history and need for such studies. In: J.D. Majer (Editor), Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Animals in Reclaimed Lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 5–33.
  48. Majer, J.D., 1989c. Long-term colonization of fauna in reclaimed land. In: J.D. Majer (Editor), Animals in Primary Succession. The Role of Animals in Reclaimed Lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 143–174.
  49. Miller, H.G., 1984. Dynamics of nutrient cycling in plantation ecosystems. In: G.D. Bowen and E.K.S. Nambiar (Editors), Nutrition of Plantation Forests. Academic Press, New York, pp. 53–78.
  50. Mitra, S.S. and Sheldon, F.H., 1993. Use of an exotic tree plantation by Bornean lowland forest birds. Auk, 110: 529–540. · DOI
  51. Montagnini, F., Fanzeres, A. and da Vinha, S.G., 1995. The potentials of 20 indigenous tree species for soil rehabilitation in the Atlantic forest region of Bahia, Brazil. J. Appl. Ecol., 32: 841–856. · DOI
  52. Moravcı́k, P., 1994. Development of new forest stands after large scale forest decline in the Krusné Hory Mountains. Ecol. Eng., 3: 57–69. · doi:10.1016/0925-8574(94)90012-4
  53. Mueller-Dombois, D., 1992. Sustainable forestry: the role of Eucalyptus and lessons from natural and artificial monoculture systems. S. Afr. For. J., 162: 15–59. · doi:10.1080/00382167.1992.9630438
  54. Odum, H.T., 1988. Self-organization, transformity and information. Science, 242: 1132–1139. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Odum, H.T., 1996. Scales of ecological engineering. Ecol. Eng., 6: 7–19. · DOI
  56. O'Loughlin, C., 1995. The sustainability paradox – an examination of The plantation effect – a review of the environmental effects of plantation forestry in New Zealand. New Zealand For., 39: 3–8.
  57. Otsamo, A., Ådjers, G., Hadi, T.S., Kuusipalo, J., Tuomela, K. and Vuokko, R., 1995. Effect of site preparation and initial fertilization on the establishment and growth of four plantation tree species used in reforestation of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. dominated grasslands. For. Ecol. Manage., 73: 271–277. · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)03483-d
  58. Parrotta, J.A., 1992. The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 41: 115–133. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Parrotta, J.A., 1993. Secondary forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. The role of plantations as `foster ecosystems'. In: H. Lieth and M. Lohmann (Editors), Restoration of Tropical Forest Ecosystems. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 63–73. · DOI
  60. Parrotta, J.A., 1995. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. J. Veg. Sci., 6: 627–636. · doi:10.2307/3236433
  61. Parrotta, J.A., Knowles, O.H. and Wunderle, J.M., 1997. Development of understory floristic diversity in 10-year-old restoration forests on a bauxite mined site in Amazonia. For. Ecol. Manage., this issue. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Pollard, G.V., 1997. Introduction and Establishment of Pink Mealybug, Maconellicoccus hisutus, in the Caribbean Su-Region and Implications for the Agriculture and Forestry Sectors. Proceedings of the Eighth Caribbean Foresters Meeting. USDA Forest Service International Institute of Tropical Forestry, in press.
  63. Rodrı́guez Pedraza, C.D., 1993. Efectos del Huracán Hugo sobre Plantaciones y Bosques Secundarios Pareados en el Bosque Experimental de Luquillo, Puerto Rico. Thesis. University of Puerto Rico, Rı́o Piedras, 105 pp.
  64. Rosoman, G., 1994. The Plantation Effect – an Ecoforestry Review of the Environmental Effects of Exotic Monoculture Tree Plantations in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Greenpeace Report, Auckland, 48 pp.
  65. Sánchez Irizarry, M.J., 1989. Estudio Comparativo de Algunas Propiedades Quı́micas y Fı́sicas de Suelos de Bosque Bajo uso Natural y Plantaciones Silvestres. Thesis. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, 80 pp.
  66. Sánchez, P.A., Palm, C.A., Davey, C.B., Szott, L.T. and Russell, C.E., 1985. Tree crops as soil improvers in the humid tropics. In: M.G.R. Cannell and J.E. Jackson (Editors), Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Natural Environment Research Council, UK, pp. 327–358.
  67. Shepherd, K.R., 1993. Significance of plantations in a global forestry strategy. Aust. For., 56: 327–335. · DOI
  68. Soni, P. and Vasistha, H.B., 1991. Understorey vegetation in Eucalyptus plantations – a review. J. Trop. For., 7: 15–26.
  69. Szaro, R.C. and Johnson, D.W. (Editors), 1996. Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes, Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York, 778 pp.
  70. Thompson, D.A., Wright, D.L. and Evelyn, O., 1986. Forest resources in Jamaica. In: D.A. Thompson, P.K. Bretting and M. Humphreys (Editors), Forests of Jamaica. The Jamaican Society of Scientists and Technologists, Kingston, pp. 81–90.
  71. Vermeij, G.J., 1986. The biology of human-caused extinction. In: B.J. Norton (Editor), The Preservation of Species. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 28–49. · doi:10.1515/9781400857869.28
  72. Wadsworth, F.H., 1995. A forest research institution in the West Indies: the first fifty years. In: A.E. Lugo and C. Lowe (Editors), Tropical Forests: Management and Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 33–56. · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2498-3_3
  73. Wang, D., Bormann, F.H., Lugo, A.E. and Bowden, R.D., 1991. Comparison of nutrient-use efficiency and biomass production in five tropical tree taxa. For. Ecol. Manage., 46: 1–21. · DOI
  74. Ward, S.C., Koch, J.M. and Ainsworth, G.L., 1995. The effect of timing of rehabilitation procedures on the establishment of a jarrah forest after bauxite mining. Rest. Ecol., 4: 19–24. · doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00103.x

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Lugo, A. E.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
99
Issue
1-2
Pages
9-19
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046705741
Cited by
402
References
1
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00191-6
The paper
Lugo, A. E. (1997). The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00191-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.