Cited by 145Forest Management and PolicyMulti-Criteria Decision MakingDecision Support System Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decision support system for the sustainable forest management

Varma, Vivek K., Ferguson, Ian, Wild, Ian·2000·Forest Ecology and Management

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00271-6

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dovers, S.R., Norton, T.W., 1994. Sustainability: questions for ecosystem management. In: Norton, T.W., Dovers, S.R. (Eds.), Ecology and Sustainability of Southern Temperate Ecosystems, CSIRO, Australia, pp. 1–9.
  2. Ferguson, I.S., 1996. Sustainable Forest Management. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 162pp.
  3. Helsinki Process, 1995. European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management adopted by the expert level follow-up meetings of the Helsinki Conference in Geneva (24 June 1994) and in Antalya (23 January 1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–144 of 144

Metadata

Authors
Varma, V. K., Ferguson, I., & Wild, I.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Varma, Vivek K.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
128
Issue
1-2
Pages
49-55
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972325327
Cited by
145
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
decision support system, sustainable forest management, forest management units, multi-criteria decision making, sustainability indicators, forest land use planning, linear programming, uncertainty management, forest management planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review