A modified Benjamini–Hochberg multiple comparisons procedure for controlling the false discovery rate
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To correct for multiple testing, the false discovery rate was calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
“To correct for multiple testing, the false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [38].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Kwong, K. S., Holland, B., & Cheung, S. H.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Temple University (US)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Holland, Burt
- Venue
- Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 351-362
- ISSN
- 0378-3758 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057633723
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Temple University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Keywords
- false discovery rate, Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, multiple comparisons, step-up procedures, family-wise error rate, type I error control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review