Base Growth Temperatures, Germination Rates and Growth Response of Contemporary Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars from the US Pacific Northwest
Abstract
In eastern Washington, spring wheat cultivars that germinate and grow fast at low temperatures will provide the crop with a competitive advantage over spring emerging weeds in commercial production fields compared to cultivars that germinate and grow more slowly. The objective of this research was to develop a protocol to identify spring wheat cultivars that would germinate and grow more quickly at low temperatures. A novel data analysis method was used to separate the germination process into three components: (1) base temperature, (2) time to initiation of germination, and (3) germination rate. Spring wheat cultivars Edwall, Vanna, Wawawai, Wampum, Express, and Spillman were assessed through a series of controlled temperature gradient plate experiments. Base temperatures were not different (P=0.1) across cultivars, and once germination was initiated, germination rates among varieties were uniform (P=0.5). However, significant (P<0.001) differences were detected among varieties for time to germination. A subsequent growth chamber experiment confirmed differences in emergence and growth rate among spring wheat cultivars.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Temperature is important in determining the duration and success of germination.
“Some studies [28-30] have similarly highlighted the importance of temperature in determining the duration and success of germination.”
From Optimizing Water, Temperature, and Density Conditions for In Vitro Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Germination (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kende, Z., Piroska, P., Szemők, G. E., Khaeim, H., Sghaier, A. H., Gyuricza, C., & Tarnawa, Á. (2024) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants13192776 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seefeldt, S. S., Kidwell, K. K., & Waller, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- AgResearch (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Seefeldt, Steven S.
- ORCID
- Seefeldt, Steven S.
- Venue
- Field Crops Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-52
- ISSN
- 0378-4290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080657611
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Field Crops Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Washington State University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Seed Germination and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Keywords
- spring wheat, wheat, cultivar screening, base temperature, germination rate, low-temperature growth, emergence, weed competition, cultivar differences, Pacific Northwest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review