Pathophysiology of endometrial bleeding
Abstract
Objectives To review the morphological and molecular events responsible for uterine bleeding in health and disease.Methods Review of pertinent literature focusing on the histology and pathophysiology of normal and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).Results The seat of normal menstrual bleeding is located in the upper two-thirds of the endometrial mucosa and is recognized by tissue necrosis, disruption of microvasculature, migratory leukocytes and platelet/fibrin thrombi in microvessels. The molecular events responsible for tissue and vascular breakdown are related to the release of proteolytic lysosomal enzymes of endometrial cell and inflammatory cell origin. In cases of AUB, tissue breakdown is located in the superficial layer (subsurface) of the endometrium. It is either focal (breakthrough bleeding) or diffuse (withdrawal bleeding). It is initiated by either chronic endometritis and/or microerosions or vascular fragility due to structural abnormalities of microvessels. Endometritis and microerosions occur in otherwise normal endometrium, polyps, submucosal leiomyomata, atrophy and cancer (organic causes). Primary vascular alterations are found in hyperestrogenic-type endometria, i.e. anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) and progestational-type endometrium, i.e. progestational contraceptives and combined, continuous hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) (non-organic causes). Ovulatory DUB and coagulation disorders are not appreciated histologically. These are related to impaired vasoconstriction and fibrinolysis and impaired coagulation factors, respectively.Conclusions Histology may contribute to better understanding of the mechanisms of action that initiate, regulate and lead to AUB. Better insight may trigger in the development of therapeutic procedures that could either prevent or control vascular breakdown which results in unexpected uterine bleeding.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is possible that a ZnIUD would cause users less pain and bleeding compared to the CuIUD, due to the absence of localised inflammation.
“Therefore, it is possible that a ZnIUD would cause users less pain and bleeding compared to the CuIUD, due to the absence of localised inflammation (24,25).”
From Zinc as a non-hormonal contraceptive: a better alternative to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) (2022) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 131
- Authors
- Ferenczy, A.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ferenczy, Alex
- Venue
- Maturitas
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967617662
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Maturitas (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Keywords
- abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial bleeding, endometrium, menstrual bleeding, endometritis, vascular fragility, lysosomal enzymes, proteolysis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, hormone replacement therapy, coagulopathy, fibrinolysis, endometrial histology
- MeSH terms
- Endometrium, Female, Humans, Menstruation, Uterine Hemorrhage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review