The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839
Cited by
The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 · Cited by 4,771
Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001 · Cited by 913
Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.06.004 · Cited by 649
Harmonisation of knowledge management – comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe
Heisig, P. (2009) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270910971798 · Cited by 615
KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance
Chang Lee, K., Lee, S., & Kang, I. W. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.02.003 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 477-490
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023728827
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 72.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00109-4
- The paper
- Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2002). Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00109-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
