The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Balding, 1994, Forensic relatedness, database selection and single bands, Forensic Sci. Int., 64, 125, 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90222-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Balding, 1995, A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity, Genetica, 96, 3, 10.1007/BF01441146 · DOI · Paper page
- Clayton, 1998, Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling, Forensic Sci. Int., 91, 55, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00175-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Curran, 1999, Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations, J. Forensic Sci., 44, 987, 10.1520/JFS12028J · doi:10.1520/jfs12028j
- E.A. Cotton, R. Allsop, J. Guest, R. Frazier, P. Koumi, I.P. Callow, A. Seager, R. Sparkes, Validation of the AMPF/STR® SGM Plus™ system for use in forensic casework (2000) in preparation. · DOI
- Evett, 1983, What is the probability that this blood came from that person: A meaningful question?, J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 23, 35, 10.1016/S0015-7368(83)71540-9 · doi:10.1016/s0015-7368(83)71540-9
- Evett, 1993, Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene, J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 33, 83, 10.1016/S0015-7368(93)72985-0 · doi:10.1016/s0015-7368(93)72985-0
- Evett, 1991, A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases, J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 31, 41, 10.1016/S0015-7368(91)73116-2 · DOI
- Findlay, 1997, Single cell DNA fingerprinting for forensic applications, Nature, 389, 555, 10.1038/39225 · DOI
- L.A. Foreman, I.W. Evett, Statistical analyses to support forensic interpretation for a new ten-locus STR profiling system. Int. J. Leg. Med. (2000) in press. · DOI
- Frazier, 1996, Validation of the Applied Biosystems Prism 377 automated sequencer for forensic short tandem repeat analysis, Electrophoresis, 1, 1
- Gill, 1997, Development of guidelines to designate alleles using a STR multiplex system, Forensic Sci. Int., 89, 185, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00131-X · DOI
- Gill, 1998, Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak area, Forensic Sci. Int., 91, 41, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00174-6 · DOI
- Harbison, 1998, Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: a caseworkers guide, Sci. Just., 38, 249, 10.1016/S1355-0306(98)72119-7 · doi:10.1016/s1355-0306(98)72119-7
- Snabes, 1994, Preimplantation single-cell analysis of multiple genetic loci by whole genome amplification, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 6181, 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6181 · DOI
- Sparkes, 1996, The validation of a 7-locus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework. I. Mixtures, ageing, degradation and species studies, Int. J. Leg. Med., 109, 186, 10.1007/BF01225517 · DOI
- Sparkes, 1996, The validation of a 7 locus multiplex STR test for use in forensic casework. II. Artefacts, casework studies and success rates, Int. J. Leg. Med., 109, 195, 10.1007/BF01225518 · DOI
- Strom, 1998, Use of nested PCR to identify charred human remains and minute amounts of blood, J. Forensic Sci., 43, 696, 10.1520/JFS16204J · doi:10.1520/jfs16204j
- Strom, 1994, Reliability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of single cells for preimplantation genetic analysis, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 11, 55, 10.1007/BF02215989 · doi:10.1007/bf02215989
- Walsh, 1991, Chelex™100 as a medium for the simple extraction of DNA for PCR based typing from forensic material, BioTechniques, 1, 91
- Walsh, 1992, A rapid chemiluminescent method for quantification of human DNA, Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 5061, 10.1093/nar/20.19.5061 · DOI
Cited by
Mystery Solved: The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using DNA Analysis
Coble, M. D., Loreille, O. M., Wadhams, M. J., Edson, S. M., Maynard, K., Meyer, C. E., Niederstätter, H., Berger, C., Berger, B., Falsetti, A. B., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004838 · Cited by 186
Self-citationReliable support: measuring calibration of likelihood ratios
Ramos, D., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. (2013) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.014 · Cited by 118
Westen, A. A., Nagel, J. H. A., Benschop, C. C. G., Weiler, N. E. C., De Jong, B. J., & Sijen, T. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01022.x · Cited by 58
NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis
Buckleton, J. S., Bright, J.-A., Cheng, K., Budowle, B., & Coble, M. D. (2018) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.014 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, P., Whitaker, J., Flaxman, C., Brown, N., & Buckleton, J.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-40
- ISSN
- 0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032467008
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00158-4
- The paper
- Gill, P., Whitaker, J., Flaxman, C., Brown, N., & Buckleton, J. (2000). An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Science International. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00158-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
