CREATING MORE PEOPLE-FRIENDLY URBAN STREETS THROUGH ‘LINK AND PLACE’ STREET PLANNING AND DESIGN
Open accessAbstract
For the last fifty years, urban street planning and design in the UK and several other European countries has been led by traffic engineers who have given priority to the needs of motor vehicles. This has resulted in street environments that are unattractive for people on foot, whether travelling along the street, or using the street as a destination for economic or social activities. Attitudes to the street environment are now changing in the UK, with the publication of a ‘Manual for Streets’ by the government, focussing on new urban residential streets, and the development of a comprehensive ‘Link and Place’ Guide to planning and designing all types of urban streets by the authors. Both documents stress the need to consider each street in its wider urban context, as both a movement channel forming part of the road network (i.e. a Link) and as Place in its own right. Design solutions should be influenced by both Link and Place user needs, and solutions will vary according to the balance of significance of these two at any location. The paper introduces the concept of Link and Place; it illustrates the range of street functions and user needs and shows how classifying streets on this basis leads to a greater consideration of the needs of people, rather than vehicles, in street planning and design. It discusses how this broadens the basis for assessing street performance and prioritising areas for improvement, and helps to determine the appropriate balance of street space and capacity to be allocated to different street user groups. This, in turn, affects the kinds of design solution appropriate in different contexts. People-based planning is central to this approach, and the paper concludes by illustrating a hands-on public consultation exercise that used Link and Place principles to redesign an urban high street to meet the needs of local residents and businesses, using both physical and computer-based design tools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jones et al. (2008) introduced a concept of 'Link and Place' to analyse streets on a basis of the needs of people, rather than vehicles.
“Jones et al. (2008) introduced a concept of BLink and Place^to analyse streets on a basis of the needs of people, rather than vehicles.”
From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Jones et al. (2008)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location
Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2018) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-018-9411-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- JONES, P., MARSHALL, S., & BOUJENKO, N.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- ORCID
- MARSHALL, Stephen
- Venue
- IATSS Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-25
- ISSN
- 0386-1112 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003456148
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IATSS Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- street design, street function, street space allocation, public consultation, pedestrian environment, road network
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review