Cited by 96Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrban Planning and Landscape Design

CREATING MORE PEOPLE-FRIENDLY URBAN STREETS THROUGH ‘LINK AND PLACE’ STREET PLANNING AND DESIGN

Open access
JONES, Peter, MARSHALL, Stephen, BOUJENKO, Natalya·2008·IATSS Research

Abstract

For the last fifty years, urban street planning and design in the UK and several other European countries has been led by traffic engineers who have given priority to the needs of motor vehicles. This has resulted in street environments that are unattractive for people on foot, whether travelling along the street, or using the street as a destination for economic or social activities. Attitudes to the street environment are now changing in the UK, with the publication of a ‘Manual for Streets’ by the government, focussing on new urban residential streets, and the development of a comprehensive ‘Link and Place’ Guide to planning and designing all types of urban streets by the authors. Both documents stress the need to consider each street in its wider urban context, as both a movement channel forming part of the road network (i.e. a Link) and as Place in its own right. Design solutions should be influenced by both Link and Place user needs, and solutions will vary according to the balance of significance of these two at any location. The paper introduces the concept of Link and Place; it illustrates the range of street functions and user needs and shows how classifying streets on this basis leads to a greater consideration of the needs of people, rather than vehicles, in street planning and design. It discusses how this broadens the basis for assessing street performance and prioritising areas for improvement, and helps to determine the appropriate balance of street space and capacity to be allocated to different street user groups. This, in turn, affects the kinds of design solution appropriate in different contexts. People-based planning is central to this approach, and the paper concludes by illustrating a hands-on public consultation exercise that used Link and Place principles to redesign an urban high street to meet the needs of local residents and businesses, using both physical and computer-based design tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0386-1112(14)60196-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jones et al. (2008) introduced a concept of 'Link and Place' to analyse streets on a basis of the needs of people, rather than vehicles.

    “Jones et al. (2008) introduced a concept of BLink and Place^to analyse streets on a basis of the needs of people, rather than vehicles.”

    From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Jones et al. (2008)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JONES, P., MARSHALL, S., & BOUJENKO, N.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
IATSS Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
14-25
ISSN
0386-1112 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003456148
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IATSS Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
street design, street function, street space allocation, public consultation, pedestrian environment, road network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review