Facilitation of saccade initiation by brainstem cholinergic system
Abstract
It is well known that the intermediate layer (SGI) of the mammalian superior colliculus (SC) receives cholinergic inputs originating from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTN). The action of the cholinergic input on the SGI neurons was investigated using whole-cell patch-clamp recording technique in slice preparations obtained from rats. Application of acetylcholine (ACh) induced fast inward currents mediated by nicotinic ACh receptors in the SGI neurons. Depolarization induced by nicotine enhanced the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potential component and lowered the threshold of bursting response in the SGI neurons to stimulation of the superficial layer. Thus, the cholinergic input to the SGI facilitates the signal transmission through the direct visuomotor pathway in the SC. The behavioral correlate of this observation was explored by microinjection of nicotine into the SC of awake monkeys during visually guided saccade task; injection of nicotine increased frequency of express saccades, the saccades with extremely short reaction times (<120 ms). Analysis of single unit activity of the PPTN neurons revealed that a population of the PPTN neurons increased firing preceding saccades in a particular direction and also during the GAP period between the offset of fixation point and onset of the saccade target. Thus, PPTN neurons may be involved in execution and preparation of saccades. All these results explain the mechanisms of how the brainstem cholinergic system facilitates initiation of saccades presumably depending on attention or vigilance level of the animal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cholinergic input from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus strongly innervates the macaque superior colliculus, and its neurones are active during saccade tasks and directly stimulate superior colliculus neurones to facilitate saccadic initiation.
“Furthermore, cholinergic input from the PPT strongly innervates the macaque SC (53), and neurones in the PPT have also been shown to be active in monkeys during saccade tasks (54) and to directly stimulate SC neurones and facilitate the initiation of saccadic eye movements (55).”
From Comparative Perspectives on Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Research in Rodents and Primates: Translational Implications (2016) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Kobayashi, Y., Saito, Y., & Isa, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Isa, Tadashi
- Venue
- Brain and Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- S24-S27
- ISSN
- 0387-7604 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981893180
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- saccade initiation, superior colliculus, pedunculopontine nucleus, cholinergic input, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, NMDA receptor, visually guided saccades, saccade reaction time, saccade preparation, attention and vigilance
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholine, Animals, Cholinergic Fibers, Humans, Neural Pathways, Nicotine, Pons, Saccades, Superior Colliculi, Tegmentum Mesencephali
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review