Cited by 8Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

Regular connections among generalized connections

Open access
Fleischhack, Christian·2003·Journal of Geometry and Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0393-0440(02)00232-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At least for the piecewise analytic category, the set of gauge orbits A/G is densely embedded into A/G and no two piecewise analytic connections fall into the same equivalence class by moding out the group of gauge transforms.

    “at least for the piecewise analytic category, the set of gauge orbits A/G is densely embedded into A/G and no two piecewise analytic connections fall into the same equivalence class by moding out the group of gauge transforms [18].”

    From Representations of the Weyl Algebra in Quantum Geometry (2009) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2][2] Abhay Ashtekar and Chris J. Isham: Representations of the holonomy algebras of gravity and nonabelian gauge theories. Class. Quant. Grav. 9 (1992) 1433-1468. e-print: hep-th/9202053 . - · arXiv
  2. [9][9] Christian Fleischhack: Mathematische und physikalische Aspekte verallgemeinerter Eichfeldtheorien im Ashtekarprogramm (Dissertation). Universit¨ at Leipzig, 2001. -
  3. [16][16] Michael Reed and Barry Simon: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. 2 (Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness) . Academic Press, Inc., London, 1975. -

Authors
Fleischhack, C.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Fleischhack, Christian
Venue
Journal of Geometry and Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
469-483
ISSN
0393-0440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075752224
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geometry and Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
generalized connections, density, measure zero, gauge orbits, loop quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review