Cited by 98Insect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Demographic mechanisms for the evolution of long life in social insects

Carey, J.R.·2001·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

One of the most remarkable life history traits of many species of eusocial insects is the extraordinary longevity of their queens, with the recorded life span of some individuals exceeding 30 years. Surprisingly, little research has been conducted on either the proximate or ultimate questions concerning what factors favor the evolution of the long life spans in social insects. The broad objective of this paper is to address four sets of questions: (1) What are the similarities and differences in the longevity patterns among species in the four main groups of social insects - bees, wasps, ants and termites? (2) What is the evolutionary association of longevity and sociality in insects? (3) Are there biodemographic principles that can be derived from studies on longevity in social insects? and (4) What are the general implications for longevity in vertebrates, including humans?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00237-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In controlled laboratory settings, social contact is linked to longer lifespan across many social species, including insects, rodents, and primates.

    “Even in controlled laboratory environments (where external threats to survival are absent), the presence of social contact is associated with increased lifespan across a range of social species including honeybees, ants, Drosophila melanogaster22,23, mice24,25, and rats26–28, as well as in free-ranging groups of macaques29, and baboons30.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 98

Authors
Carey, J. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Carey, J.R.
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
36
Issue
4-6
Pages
713-722
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023535953
Cited by
98
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG008761, AG08761)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
longevity, eusocial insects, queen longevity, life history evolution, sociality, biodemography, bees, wasps, ants, termites
MeSH terms
Animals, Ants, Bees, Behavior, Animal, Biological Evolution, Humans, Insecta, Longevity, Social Behavior, Wasps, Isoptera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review