The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculating vacuum energies in renormalizable quantum field theories:
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The Casimir problem is usually posed as the response of a fluctuating quantum field to externally imposed boundary conditions. In reality, however, no interaction is strong enough to enforce a boundary condition on all frequencies of a fluctuating field. We construct a more physical model of the situation by coupling the fluctuating field to a smooth background potential that implements the boundary condition in a certain limit. To study this problem, we develop general new methods to compute renormalized one-loop quantum energies and energy densities. We use analytic properties of scattering data to compute Green's functions in time-independent background fields at imaginary momenta. Our calculational method is particularly useful for numerical studies of singular limits because it avoids terms that oscillate or require cancellation of exponentially growing and decaying factors. To renormalize, we identify potentially divergent contributions to the Casimir energy with low orders in the Born series to the Green's function. We subtract these contributions and add back the corresponding Feynman diagrams, which we combine with counterterms fixed by imposing standard renormalization conditions on low-order Green's functions. The resulting Casimir energy and energy density are finite functionals for smooth background potentials. In general, however, the Casimir energy diverges in the boundary condition limit. This divergence is real and reflects the infinite energy needed to constrain a fluctuating field on all energy scales; renormalizable quantum field theories have no place for ad hoc surface counterterms. We apply our methods to simple examples to illustrate cases where these subtleties invalidate the conclusions of the boundary condition approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
Cited by
Advances in the Casimir Effect
Bordag, M., Klimchitskaya, G. L., Mohideen, U., & Mostepanenko, V. M. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238743.001.0001 · Cited by 1,284
Heat kernel expansion: user's manual
Vassilevich, D. V. (2003) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.002 · Cited by 1,016
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, N., Jaffe, R. L., Khemani, V., Quandt, M., Scandurra, M., & Weigel, H.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 645
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 49-84
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1635538198
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calculating vacuum energies in renormalizable quantum field theories:. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00823-4
- The paper
- Graham, N., Jaffe, R. L., Khemani, V., Quandt, M., Scandurra, M., & Weigel, H. (2002). Calculating vacuum energies in renormalizable quantum field theories:. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(02)00823-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.