Cited by 102

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical origin of black hole entropy in induced gravity

Frolov, V.P., Fursaev, D.V., Zelnikov, A.I.·1997·Nuclear Physics B

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(96)00678-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In scenarios of gravity induced due to matter loops, the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is solely due to entanglement due to vacuum fluctuations, where the UV-cutoff dependence can be absorbed in a renormalization of Newton's constant.

    “In particular, in scenarios of gravity induced due to matter loops [221,222], the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is solely due to entanglement due to vacuum fluctuations [223][224][225], where the UV-cutoff dependence can be absorbed in a renormalization of Newton's constant [130].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [224]

    Section 4 (Eq. 4.30; page unavailable) says that, in the induced-gravity model studied, Bekenstein–Hawking entropy is not solely a statistical-mechanical entropy: it also requires a horizon term involving scalar-field fluctuations. The authors say that term is not related to counting states and removes divergences. The UV-cutoff renormalization clause is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The null energy condition requires that all asymptotically flat or AdS spacetimes have positive ADM mass.

    “and requires that all asymptotically flat or AdS spacetimes to have positive ADM mass [14,12,13].”

    From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [14]

    Section 2, “Induced gravity: a simple model,” discusses the induced gravitational and cosmological constants and vacuum black-hole solutions, not a positive-mass requirement. Searches for the null energy condition, asymptotically flat or AdS spacetimes, and positive ADM mass found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The GSL and GSL together imply a positive energy theorem.

    “An immediate corollary is that the GSL and GSL together imply a positive energy theorem, by the principles outlined in Ref. [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bekenstein, 1972, Nuov. Cim. Lett., 4, 737, 10.1007/BF02757029 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bekenstein, 1973, Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2333, 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bekenstein, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 9, 3292, 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3292 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gibbons, 1976, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Srednicki, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 666, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.666 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Frolov, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 4545, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.4545 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Frolov, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 3319, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3319 · DOI
  8. Callan, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 333, 55, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)91007-3 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fursaev, 1996, Phys. Lett. B, 365, 51, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01290-7 · DOI
  10. Demers, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 2245, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.2245 · DOI
  11. deAlwis, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 3529, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3529 · DOI
  12. Solodukhin, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 7046, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.7046 · DOI
  13. Bytsenko, 1996, Nucl. Phys. B, 458, 267, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00585-4 · DOI
  14. Kabat, 1995, Nucl. Phys. B, 453, 281, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00443-V · DOI
  15. Larsen, 1996, Nucl. Phys. B, 458, 49, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00548-X · DOI
  16. Frolov, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2711, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2711 · DOI
  17. Mann, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 3932, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.3932 · DOI
  18. Cognola, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2699, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2699 · DOI
  19. Barvinsky, 1996, Nucl. Phys. B, 479, 305, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00438-5 · DOI
  20. Frolov, 1996, Phys. Lett. B, 382, 220, 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00661-2 · DOI
  21. T. Jacobson, Black Hole Entropy and Induced Gravity, preprint gr-qc/9404039. · arXiv
  22. Sakharov, 1968, Sov. Phys. Doklady, 12, 1040
  23. York, 1986, Phys. Rev. D, 33, 2092, 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2092 · DOI
  24. Braden, 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 42, 3376, 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3376 · DOI
  25. Fursaev, 1994, Class. Quantum. Grav., 11, 1431, 10.1088/0264-9381/11/6/008 · DOI
  26. Cognola, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 1029, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1029 · DOI
  27. D.V. Fursaev and G. Miele, Cones, Spins and Heat Kernels, preprint ALBERTA-THY-17-96, hepth/9605153, to appear in Nucl. Phys. B.
  28. Larsen, 1996, Phys. Lett. B, 375, 37, 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00220-1 · DOI
  29. Larsen, 1996, Nucl. Phys. B, 475, 627, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00318-5 · DOI
  30. Horowitz, 1996, Phys. Lett. B, 383, 151, 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00738-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frolov, V. P., Fursaev, D. V., & Zelnikov, A. I.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-02
Volume
486
Issue
1-2
Pages
339-352
ISSN
0550-3213
Cited by
102
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review