Cited by 22Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyTraditional Chinese Medicine Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GC–MS analysis of incenses for possible presence of allergenic nitromusks

Roveri, P., Andrisano, V., Di Pietra, A.M., Cavrini, V.·1998·Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Abstract

A Gas chromatographic method with mass detector was developed to identify and determine nitromusks in incense sticks of different origin (India, China, Tibet). The proposed method was found useful to correlate dermatological allergic reactions with the use and composition of commercial incense sticks. The incense sticks were powdered, extracted with methanol and after the addition of 1-eicosanol as internal standard, injected into the GC-MS, using 25 m bonded phase fused capillary column methyl, 5% phenyl silicone (0.32 mm I.D., 0.25 microns film thickness). Musk ambrette was identified and determined in one kind of chinese incense together with musk ketone and musk xylene. The latter compound was also found alone in another kind of chinese incense.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0731-7085(97)00219-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volatile compounds emitted from incense may reach uncovered skin and cause contact dermatitis.

    “The volatile compounds emitted may reach uncovered skin and cause contact dermatitis (Roveri et al. 1998 ).”

    From Incense: Ritual, Health Effects and Prudence (2013) · cites this paper as Roveri et al. 1998

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Basto, 1991, Contact Dermat., 24, 312, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01738.x · DOI
  2. Hayakawa, 1987, Contact Dermat., 16, 272, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01451.x · DOI
  3. Emerit, 1981, Nature (London), 144, 293
  4. Betts, 1982, J. Chromatogr., 244, 381, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)85705-2 · DOI
  5. Spanedda, 1986, J. Chromatogr., 362, 278, 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)86977-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roveri, P., Andrisano, V., Di Pietra, A. M., & Cavrini, V.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Cavrini, V.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
393-398
ISSN
0731-7085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039931355
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Keywords
incense sticks, musk ambrette, musk ketone, musk xylene, GC-MS method development
MeSH terms
Allergens, Dinitrobenzenes, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Perfume, Resins, Plant, Xylenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review