An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles
Abstract
Dissolution efficiency (D.E.), the area under a dissolution curve between defined time points, and the fit factors (f1 and f2) have been compared for the characterisation of dissolution profiles, using data from three batches of a product in nine different packs stored under two conditions. The factors f1 and f2 offer ease of calculation and a simple measure of similarity between pairs of dissolution profiles. This is well suited to the qualitative determination of 'similarity' as required by the FDA's SUPAC Guide. However, they do not provide information on individual batches, including their consistency. In contrast, D.E. does provide such information is well-suited to making quantitative comparisons amongst batches. Because D.E. has a simple physical meaning, it is easier to interpret D.E. data then corresponding f1 and f2 results. The confidence limits in D.E. values provide a useful measure of the variability in batch dissolution and allow the statistical significance of difference in D.E. between pairs of batches to be determined. Both of the above measures lead to the same conclusions regarding the similarity in protective power amongst the nine packs under test and to the value of added desiccant in maintaining the dissolution profile of the product when stored under high humidity conditions. It is concluded that D.E. offers a suitable alternative to the single point dissolution measurement for QC of immediate release products.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the differences of the mean dissolution efficiencies and 95% confidence intervals are within ±10%, the reference and test dissolution profiles are equivalent.
“If the differences of the mean dissolution efficiencies as well as the 95% confidence intervals are within appropriate limits (±10%), one can conclude that the reference and test dissolution profiles are equivalent 12 .”
From Evaluation and comparison of in-vitro dissolution profiles for different brands of amoxicillin capsules (2013) · cites this paper as [12]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kassaye, L., & Genete, G. (2013) · African Health Sciences · doi:10.4314/ahs.v13i2.25 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Hambisa, S., Belew, S., & Suleman, S. (2019) · Drug Design Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s189524 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“As reported by Anderson et al, the reference and the test products can be said to be equivalent if the difference between their dissolution efficiencies is within appropriate limits (±10%).(35) Based on this requirement, products N1, N5, and N7 are equivalent to brand N9 (comparator) as difference of % (test product –…”
Background
- Authors
- Anderson, N. H., Bauer, M., Boussac, N., Khan-Malek, R., Munden, P., & Sardaro, M.
- Affiliations
- Sanofi (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Sanofi (France) (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, N.H.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 811-822
- ISSN
- 0731-7085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999885157
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
- Keywords
- dissolution profile, dissolution efficiency, in vitro dissolution, batch-to-batch consistency, desiccants, batch-to-batch variation
- MeSH terms
- Models, Chemical, Solubility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review