The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of oral immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (ER) metronidazole bactericidal activity against Bacteroides spp. using an in vitro model of infection
Abstract
We used an anaerobic infection model capable of simulating human serum pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), C(min), half-life, and AUC) to compare the activity of oral immediate-release (IR) and extended-release (ER) MTZ formulations. Four oral regimens of MTZ plus a control regimen were simulated in the model: [i] (IR) 500 mg q8h, [ii] ER 750 mg q12h, [iii] ER 750 mg q24h, and [iv] ER 1500 mg q24h. Two clinical Bacteroides fragilis isolates (MICs 0.5, 4.0 microg/mL) and two non-fragilis Bacteroides isolates (MICs 0.5, 3 microg/mL) were studied. All four oral MTZ regimens exhibited rapid, bactericidal activity (> or =3-log(10) decrease from the starting inoculum) within 12 h against both fragilis and non-fragilis Bacteroides isolates. Overall, no appreciable difference in the rate of bacteria killing was noted among the four MTZ formulations against either B. fragilis isolates (P = 0.907, 0.737) or non-fragilis isolates (P = 0.809, 0.768). We conclude that ER MTZ dosed at 12 or 24-h intervals possesses equivalent bactericidal activity to standard IR MTZ dosed every eight hours against susceptible Bacteroides spp.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The time kill kinetics assay evaluates antimicrobial agents at static concentrations, which may not precisely mimic dynamic drug concentrations observed in vivo.
“The assay evaluates antimicrobial agents at static concentrations, which may not precisely mimic the dynamic drug concentrations observed in vivo [48].”
From Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bergan, 1980, Pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in healthy adult volunteers after tablets and suppositories, Chemotherapy, 26, 231, 10.1159/000237911 · DOI
- Blaser, 1987, In vitro models for the study of antibiotic activities, Prog Drug Res, 31, 349
- Craig, 1998, Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, Clin Infect Dis, 26, 1, 10.1086/516284 · DOI · Paper page
- Craig, W. A. & Gudmundsson, S. (1996). Postantibiotic effect. In V. Lorian (Ed), Antibiotics and Laboratory Medicine, 4th ed. (pp. 296–329). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
- Grasson, 1978, New in vitro model to study the effect of antibiotic concentration and rate of elimination on antibacterial activity, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 13, 570, 10.1128/AAC.13.4.570 · DOI
- Nix, 1995, Pharmacodynamics of metronidazole determined by a time-kill assay for Trichomonas vaginalis, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 39, 1848, 10.1128/AAC.39.8.1848 · DOI
- Pearson, 1980, Method for reliable determination of minimal lethal antibiotic concentrations, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 18, 699, 10.1128/AAC.18.5.699 · DOI
- Peterson, M. L., Hovde, B., Wright, D. H., Hoang, A. D., & Rotschafer, J. C. (1998). Trovafloxacin and levofloxacin resistance in Bacteroides fragilis.E-32, p. 176. In Programs and abstracts of the 38th Interscience Conference, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
- Ralph, 1983, Clinical pharmacokinetics of metronidazole, Clin Pharmacokin, 8, 43, 10.2165/00003088-198308010-00003 · DOI
- Rasmussen, 1997, Antimicrobial resistance in anaerobes, Clin Infect Dis, 24, S110, 10.1093/clinids/24.Supplement_1.S110 · DOI
- Stratton, 1991, Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group, Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 14, 377, 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-M · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hossain, T. J. (2024) · European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1556/1886.2024.00035 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, R. E., Klepser, M. E., Ernst, E. J., Snabes, M. A., & Jones, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Knowledge Systems Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klepser, Michael E.
- Venue
- Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-55
- ISSN
- 0732-8893 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035196995
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Keywords
- metronidazole, sustained-release formulation, immediate-release formulation, Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides, bactericidal activity, pharmacokinetic simulation, antibiotic susceptibility, anaerobic infections
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Bacteroides, Bacteroides fragilis, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dosage Forms, Humans, Metronidazole, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Models, Biological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review