Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Control of Intraatrial Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

Open access
Triedman, John K, Bergau, Dennis M, Saul, J.Philip, Epstein, Michael R, Walsh, Edward P·1997·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is a common problem in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The progression of clinical symptoms of IART and their response to radiofrequency (RF) ablation are not yet well described. OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to determine the early and midterm success rates of RF ablation in effecting a reduction of clinical arrhythmic events in patients with IART and CHD. METHODS Clinical records of patients undergoing early, successful RF ablation were analyzed retrospectively to document the occurrence and frequency of documented IART, cardioversion and arrhythmia-related hospital visits before and after ablation. RESULTS Fifty-five catheterizations for intended RF ablation of IART were performed in 45 patients (mean [+/-SD] age 24.5 +/- 10.5 years, 40 after surgical palliation of CHD). Early success was achieved for one or more IART circuits in 33 patients (73%). Mean clinical follow-up of those patients with successful ablation is 17.4 +/- 11.3 months (total 574 patient-months). Documented IART recurrence was noted after 21 (53%) of 40 early, successful catheterizations in 17 (52%) of 33 patients, with a mean time to recurrence of 4.1 months, often with electrocardiographically novel configurations. A more prolonged and frequent history of IART was a univariate risk factor for recurrence. Seven patients underwent repeat RF ablations, and eight patients were restarted on antiarrhythmic medications after ablation. Two patients who had severe ventricular dysfunction before RF ablation died 1.5 and 11 months after RF ablation without known arrhythmia recurrence. Clinical events related to IART increased steadily in frequency for 24 months before RF ablation. Radiofrequency ablation resulted in a reduction of event frequency to levels significantly lower than those in the 12-month period before RF ablation and not significantly different from those levels observed at baseline 3 to 4 years before RF ablation. CONCLUSIONS In patients with successful RF ablation, the frequency of subsequent events was reduced compared with the 2 preceding years. However, recurrence of IART in patients who showed clinical improvement was frequent, and often revealed the presence of new IART configurations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00252-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Triedman, J. K., Bergau, D. M., Saul, J. P., Epstein, M. R., & Walsh, E. P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
1032-1038
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008489939
Cited by
210
References
1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Control of Intraatrial Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00252-0
The paper
Triedman, J. K., Bergau, D. M., Saul, J. P., Epstein, M. R., & Walsh, E. P. (1997). Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Control of Intraatrial Reentrant Tachycardia in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00252-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.