Cited by 242Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Conversion Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ibutilide Compared With Intravenous Procainamide in Patients With Atrial Flutter or Fibrillation 11This study was sponsored by Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan.22See Appendix Afor a complete list of investigators and study sites.

Open access
Volgman, Annabelle S, Carberry, Peter A, Stambler, Bruce, Lewis, William R, Dunn, George H, Perry, Kimberly T, VanderLugt, James T, Kowey, Peter R·1998·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of ibutilide versus procainamide for conversion of recent-onset atrial flutter or fibrillation.Background Ibutilide fumarate is an intravenous (IV) class III antiarrhythmic agent that has been shown to be significantly more effective than placebo in the pharmacologic conversion of atrial flutter and fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Procainamide is commonly used for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm.Methods One hundred twenty-seven patients (age range 22 to 92 years) with atrial flutter or fibrillation of 3 h to 90 days' (mean 21 days) duration were randomized to receive either two 10-min IV infusions of 1 mg of ibutilide fumarate, separated by a 10-min infusion of 5% dextrose in sterile water, or three successive 10-min IV infusions of 400 mg of procainamide hydrochloride.Results Of the 127 patients, 120 were evaluated for efficacy: 35 (58.3%) of 60 in the ibutilide group compared with 11 (18.3%) of 60 in the procainamide group had successful termination within 1.5 h of treatment (p < 0.0001). Seven patients were found to have violated the protocol and were not included in the final evaluation. In the patients with atrial flutter, ibutilide had a significantly higher success rate than procainamide (76% [13 of 17] vs. 14% [3 of 22], p=0.001). Similarly, in the atrial fibrillation group, ibutilide had a significantly higher success rate than procainamide (51% [22 of 43] vs. 21% [8 of 38], p=0.005). One patient who received ibutilide, which was found to be a protocol violation, had sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring direct current cardioversion. Seven patients who received procainamide became hypotensive.Conclusions This study establishes the superior efficacy of ibutilide over procainamide when administered to patients to convert either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter to sinus rhythm. Hypotension was the major adverse effect seen with procainamide. A low incidence of serious proarrhythmia was seen with the administration of ibutilide occurring at the end of infusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00078-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 242

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. VanderLugt JT, Gaylor SK, Wakefield LK, et al. Effects of ibutilide fumarate, a new class III antiarrhythmic agent, in man [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;49:188.

Authors
Volgman, A. S., Carberry, P. A., Stambler, B., Lewis, W. R., Dunn, G. H., Perry, K. T., VanderLugt, J. T., & Kowey, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Kalamazoo Public Library (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Carberry, Peter A
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1414-1419
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1557874646
Cited by
242
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
ibutilide, procainamide, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, conversion to sinus rhythm, class III antiarrhythmic agents, intravenous antiarrhythmic therapy, drug efficacy comparison, drug safety, ventricular tachycardia, hypotension, cardioversion, hypokalemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Double-Blind Method, Electric Countershock, Female, Humans, Male, Procainamide, Prospective Studies, Sulfonamides, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review