The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads
Open accessAbstract
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be anatomically divided into anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles. Current ACL reconstruction techniques focus primarily on reproducing the AM bundle, but are insufficient in response to rotatory loads. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of in situ force between the two bundles when the knee is subjected to anterior tibial and rotatory loads. Ten cadaveric knees (50 ± 10 years) were tested using a robotic/universal forcemoment sensor (UFS) testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: a 134 N anterior tibial load at full knee extension and 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion and a combined rotatory load of 10 N m valgus and 5 N m internal tibial torque at 15° and 30° of flexion. The resulting 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee and the in situ forces in the ACL and its two bundles were determined. Under an anterior tibial load, the in situ force in the PL bundle was the highest at full extension (67 ± 30 N) and decreased with increasing flexion. The in situ force in the AM bundle was lower than in the PL bundle at full extension, but increased with increasing flexion, reaching a maximum (90 ± 17 N) at 60° of flexion and then decreasing at 90°. Under a combined rotatory load, the in situ force of the PL bundle was higher at 15° (21 ± 11 N) and lower at 30° of flexion (14 ± 6 N). The in situ force in the AM bundle was similar at 15° and 30° of knee flexion (30 ± 15 vs. 35 ± 16 N, respectively). Comparing these two external loading conditions demonstrated the importance of the PL bundle, especially when the knee is near full extension. These findings provide a better understanding of the function of the two bundles of the ACL and could serve as a basis for future considerations of surgical reconstruction in the replacement of the ACL. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peña, E., Calvo, B., Martínez, M. A., & Doblaré, M. (2006) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.030 · Cited by 506
Xie, X., Liu, X., Chen, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, S., & Li, Q. (2015) · The Knee · doi:10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014 · Cited by 375
Zantop, T., Wellmann, M., Fu, F. H., & Petersen, W. (2008) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546507308361 · Cited by 344
Amis, A. A. (2012) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1864-7 · Cited by 143
Jordan, S. S., DeFrate, L. E., Wook Nha, K., Papannagari, R., Gill, T. J., & Li, G. (2007) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506295941 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabriel, M. T., Wong, E. K., Woo, S. L., Yagi, M., & Debski, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-89
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W2078772261
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00133-5
- The paper
- Gabriel, M. T., Wong, E. K., Woo, S. L., Yagi, M., & Debski, R. E. (2004). Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00133-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.