Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 673

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads

Open access
Gabriel, Mary T., Wong, Eric K., Woo, Savio L‐Y., Yagi, Masayoshi, Debski, Richard E.·2004·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be anatomically divided into anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles. Current ACL reconstruction techniques focus primarily on reproducing the AM bundle, but are insufficient in response to rotatory loads. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of in situ force between the two bundles when the knee is subjected to anterior tibial and rotatory loads. Ten cadaveric knees (50 ± 10 years) were tested using a robotic/universal forcemoment sensor (UFS) testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: a 134 N anterior tibial load at full knee extension and 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion and a combined rotatory load of 10 N m valgus and 5 N m internal tibial torque at 15° and 30° of flexion. The resulting 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee and the in situ forces in the ACL and its two bundles were determined. Under an anterior tibial load, the in situ force in the PL bundle was the highest at full extension (67 ± 30 N) and decreased with increasing flexion. The in situ force in the AM bundle was lower than in the PL bundle at full extension, but increased with increasing flexion, reaching a maximum (90 ± 17 N) at 60° of flexion and then decreasing at 90°. Under a combined rotatory load, the in situ force of the PL bundle was higher at 15° (21 ± 11 N) and lower at 30° of flexion (14 ± 6 N). The in situ force in the AM bundle was similar at 15° and 30° of knee flexion (30 ± 15 vs. 35 ± 16 N, respectively). Comparing these two external loading conditions demonstrated the importance of the PL bundle, especially when the knee is near full extension. These findings provide a better understanding of the function of the two bundles of the ACL and could serve as a basis for future considerations of surgical reconstruction in the replacement of the ACL. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00133-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gabriel, M. T., Wong, E. K., Woo, S. L., Yagi, M., & Debski, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
85-89
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2078772261
Cited by
673
References
0
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00133-5
The paper
Gabriel, M. T., Wong, E. K., Woo, S. L., Yagi, M., & Debski, R. E. (2004). Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00133-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.