The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success
Abstract
In companies where new product development plays an important strategic role, managers necessarily contend with a portfolio of projects that range from high technology, new-to-the-world, innovations to relatively simple improvements, adaptations, line extensions, or imitations of competitive offerings. Recent studies indicate that achieving successful outcomes for projects that differ radically in terms of innovativeness requires that firms adjust their NPD practices in line with the type of new product project they are developing. Based on a large-scale survey of managers knowledgeable about new product development in their firm, this study focuses on new business-to-business service projects in an attempt to gain insights about the influence of product innovativeness on the factors that are linked to new service success and failure. The research results indicate that there are a small number of “global” success factors which appear to govern the outcome of new service ventures, regardless of their degree of newness. These include: ensuring an excellent customer/need fit, involving expert front line personnel in creating the new service and in helping customers appreciate its distinctiveness and benefits, and implementing a formal and planned launch program for the new service offering. Several other factors, however, were found to play a more distinctive role in the outcome of new service ventures, depending on how really new or innovative the new service was. For low innovativeness new business services, the results suggest that managers can enhance performance by: leveraging the firm's unique competencies, experiences and reputation through the introduction of new services that have a strong corporate fit; installing a formal “stage-gate” new service development system, particularly at the front-end and during the design stage of the development process; and ensuring that efforts to differentiate services from competitive or past offerings do not lead to high cost or unnecessarily complex service offerings. For new-to-the-world business services, the primary distinguishing feature impacting performance is the corporate culture of the firm: one that encourages entrepreneurship and creativity, and that actively involves senior managers in the role of visionary and mentor for new service development. In addition, good market potential and marketing tactics that offset the intangibility of “really new” service concepts appear to have a positive performance effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review
Tukker, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · Cited by 1,961
Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017 · Cited by 1,123
The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation
Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300282005 · Cited by 957
The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model
Reid, S. E., & De Brentani, U. (2004) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x · Cited by 707
Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance
Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.001 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- de Brentani, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-187
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144884044
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0737-6782(01)00071-6
- The paper
- de Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(01)00071-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.