Readiness to adopt adequate postural habits: an application of the Transtheoretical Model in the context of back pain prevention
Abstract
Based on a biomechanical model, an adequate body posture can contribute to the prevention of back pain and back pain chronicity. This study examines the explanatory value of the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) for the adoption of adequate postural habits in a cross-sectional sample of 149 employees of a German administration unit (mean age 40.2 years, 50% female). Using newly developed instruments with satisfactory psychometric properties, basic assumptions of the TTM could be confirmed: self-efficacy and the perceived pros for maintaining a good body posture increased significantly across the stages, while the perceived cons decreased. Additionally, the use of preventive strategies for back pain prevention increased linearly and significantly across the stages of change. The study supports the applicability of the TTM for postural behavior. Considering stages of change as an intervening variable may contribute to clarifying the relationship between participation in low back schools and prevention of back pain chronicity. Longitudinal and intervention study data are needed to support these assumptions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The transtheoretical model is applicable to postural behavior contributing to the prevention of back pain and back pain chronicity.
“supported the applicability of the transtheoretical model for postural behavior contributing to the prevention of back pain and back pain chronicity.”
From Adjustment to Chronic Pain in Back Pain Patients Classified According to the Motivational Stages of Chronic Pain Management (2006) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Kerns, R. D., & Rosenberg, R. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00184-0 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zenker, S., Petraschka, M., Schenk, M., Reißhauer, A., Newie, T., Hermanns, K., Wernecke, K.-D., & Spies, C. (2006) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2006.01.446 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Keller, S., Herda, C., Ridder, K., & Basler, H.-D.
- Affiliations
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Keller, Stefan
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043147963
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- transtheoretical model, postural habits, back pain prevention, low back pain, chronic low back pain, stages of change, self-efficacy, perceived benefits and barriers, preventive strategies, occupational health, office workers, posture
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Back Pain, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Posture, Psychometrics, Health Behavior, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review