Cited by 231Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsRenal and Vascular PathologiesPeripheral Artery Disease Management

The clinical course of asymptomatic mesenteric arterial stenosis

Open access
Thomas, James H., Blake, Kathleen, Pierce, George E., Hermreck, Arlo S., Seigel, Edward·1998·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Purpose The incidence of subsequent symptomatic mesenteric vascular disease is unknown for patients who have asymptomatic mesenteric arterial stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of developing acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia in patients identified by lateral aortography to have significant mesenteric artery stenosis. Methods From 1989 through 1995, 980 consecutive aortograms with anteroposterior and lateral projections were reviewed within 1 week of arteriography to identify patients who had significant mesenteric stenosis but no symptoms of mesenteric ischemia. Eighty-two patients were found to have 50% stenosis of at least one mesenteric artery and were monitored by interview to determine if symptoms of acute or chronic mesenteric ischemia developed. Results Ten patients were lost to follow-up, and 12 patients were withdrawn from the study because of mild mesenteric arterial disease (1% to 49% stenosis) in combination with more significant disease of other vessels. Follow-up was 1 to 6 years. The overall mortality rate was 40%, and mesenteric ischemia developed in four patients. Each of these four patients had significant (>50%) stenosis or occlusion of the celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric artery. Eighty-six percent of the 15 patients with significant three-vessel arterial disease had mesenteric ischemia, had other vague abdominal symptoms, or died. Conclusions Patients with significant three-vessel mesenteric arterial stenosis should be considered for prophylactic mesenteric arterial reconstruction. Mesenteric arterial reconstruction should be routine when these patients undergo aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70263-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 231

Authors
Thomas, J. H., Blake, K., Pierce, G. E., Hermreck, A. S., & Seigel, E.
Affiliations
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
840-844
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030757823
Cited by
231
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, chronic mesenteric ischemia, celiac artery stenosis, superior mesenteric artery stenosis, aortic reconstruction, mortality
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Diseases, Aortography, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Celiac Artery, Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesenteric Arteries, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Incidence, Survival Rate, Mesenteric Artery, Inferior, Mesenteric Artery, Superior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review