The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: A statewide analysis of 9918 cases
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact of patient age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in contemporary practice. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (MHSCRC) database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent elective CEA as the primary procedure in all acute care hospitals in the state over the past 6 years. RESULTS: From January 1990 through December 1995, 9918 elective CEAs were performed in 48 hospitals at a total charge of $68.9 million. Postoperative death and neurologic complications occurred in 90 (0.9%) and 166 (1.7%) cases, including 0.8% and 1.7%, 0.9% and 1.6%, 0.9% and 1.8%, and 1.4% and 1.3% of patients < 65 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and > or = 80 years old, respectively. The mean length of stay and hospital charges increased linearly with increasing age: 4.2 days/$6550, 4.4 days/$6834, 4.8 days/$7059, and 5.6 days (p < 0.0001 vs others)/$7756 (p < 0.005 vs 70 to 79 years and p < 0.0003 vs < 70 years old), respectively, for patients < 65, 65 to 69, 70 to 79, and > or = 80 years old. The mortality rate was 1.9% in low-volume hospitals, 1.1% in moderate-volume hospitals, and 0.8% in high-volume hospitals. The neurologic complication rate was significantly higher (6.1%; p < 0.0001) in low-volume when compared with moderate-volume (1.3%) and high-volume (1.8%) hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a safe procedure in the majority of hospitals in contemporary practice, even among the very elderly, who may experience a longer length of stay and higher charges correlating with their documented greater medical complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Hazards of Hospitalization of the Elderly
Creditor, M. C. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011 · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
Halm, E. A., Lee, C., & Chassin, M. R. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012 · Cited by 1,704
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Hospital Volume, Length of Stay, and Readmission Rates in High-Risk Surgery
Goodney, P. P., Stukel, T. A., Lucas, F. L., Finlayson, E. V. A., & Birkmeyer, J. D. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000081094.66659.c3 · Cited by 314
The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures
Pearce, W. H., Parker, M. A., Feinglass, J., Ujiki, M., & Manheim, L. M. (1999) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70202-8 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Perler, B. A., Dardik, A., Burleyson, G. P., Gordon, T. A., & Williams, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101032288
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: A statewide analysis of 9918 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70288-5
- The paper
- Perler, B. A., Dardik, A., Burleyson, G. P., Gordon, T. A., & Williams, G. M. (1998). Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: A statewide analysis of 9918 cases. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70288-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.