Cited by 214Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Behavior and Motivation

APPLYING SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY TO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH

Sheldon, Kennon M, Turban, Daniel B, Brown, Kenneth G, Barrick, Murray R, Judge, Timothy A·2004·Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management

Abstract

In this chapter we argue that self-determination theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 2000) provides a useful conceptual tool for organizational researchers, one that complements traditional work motivation theories. First, we review SDT, showing that it has gone far beyond the “intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation” dichotomy with which it began. Then we show how the theory might be applied to better understand a variety of organizational phenomena, including the positive effects of transformational leadership, the nature of “true” goal-commitment, the determinants of employees’ training motivation, and the positive impact of certain human resource practices. We note that SDT may yield significant new understanding of work motivation, and suggest opportunities to refine the theory for research on work-related phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22008-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings suggest it is possible to study various combinations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, since workers can simultaneously display different types of motivation or behavioral regulation.

    “In agreement with earlier studies [31,32,33,65], our findings suggest that it is possible to study various combinations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, since workers can simultaneously display different types of motivation or behavioral regulation [66].”

    From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [66]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 142 · Cited by 214

Authors
Sheldon, K. M., Turban, D. B., Brown, K. G., Barrick, M. R., & Judge, T. A.
Venue
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
Published
2004-05-19
Pages
357-393
ISSN
0742-7301 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2480317327
Cited by
214
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in personnel and human resources management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
self-determination theory, employee motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, transformational leadership, goal commitment, training motivation, human resource management practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review