Cited by 2Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsIon channel regulation and functionGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Effects of aluminum ions on K+-induced contraction in ileal longitudinal smooth muscle

Nasu, Tetsuyuki, Suzuki, Nozomi·1998·Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology

Abstract

The mechanism of the inhibition of K(+)-induced contraction caused by aluminum ions (Al3+) was analyzed in ileal longitudinal muscle and taenia coli of guinea-pig. Al3+ (2-5 mM) inhibited dose-dependently the high-K+ (60 mM, hypertonic)-induced contraction in ileal muscle. Al3+ reduced the size of the maximal response to Ca2+ without shifting the concentration-response curves to Ca2+ in taenia coli. Al3+ caused a significant decrease in Ca uptake, measured by the lanthanum method, during the K(+)-induced ileal first phase of the response. Following treatment with 5 mM Al3+ for 0.5-20 min, the ileal K(+)-induced contraction returned to a greater extent, after washing with medium containing the chelator deferoxamine, compared to normal medium. However, with increasing duration, > 30 min of Al3+ treatment, the K(+)-induced contraction did not recover, despite washing with deferoxamine. The aluminum in the cells was even more eliminated by washing with deferoxamine when the duration of Al3+ treatment was < 20 min. The present findings indicate that the inhibitory action by Al3+ on K(+)-induced contraction at the shorter treatment (< 20 min) may result from the interference of calcium permeability at the cell membrane in ileal muscle. However, with increasing duration of Al3+ treatment, Al3+ ions accumulate in intracellular compartments where deferoxamine cannot reach, and it may exert an inhibitory action on internal sites in ileal cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0742-8413(98)00034-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smooth muscle contraction induced by K+ ion was inhibited by Al exposure.

    “Smooth muscle contraction induced by K+ ion was inhibited by Al exposure (Nasu et al., 1998).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Nasu et al., 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nasu, T., & Suzuki, N.
Affiliations
Yamaguchi University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nasu, Tetsuyuki
Venue
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
120
Issue
1
Pages
137-143
ISSN
0742-8413 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065041617
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C Pharmacology Toxicology and Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
aluminum ions, potassium-induced contraction, taenia coli, calcium uptake, calcium permeability, deferoxamine, aluminum accumulation, smooth muscle contraction inhibition, guinea pig
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Animals, Calcium, Cations, Chelating Agents, Colon, Deferoxamine, Drug Interactions, Guinea Pigs, Ileum, Kinetics, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Smooth, Potassium, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review