Cited by 592Gender and Technology in EducationDigital literacy in educationTechnology Use by Older Adults

Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences

Schumacher, P., Morahan-Martin, J.·2001·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00032-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J.
Affiliations
Bryant University (US)
Corresponding author
Schumacher, P.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
95-110
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023036738
Cited by
592
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
46.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Bryant Digital Repository (Bryant University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
gender differences, internet use, attitudes toward computers, computer experience, computer skills, computer proficiency, email, attitudes toward technology, computer literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review