The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS
Open accessAbstract
The relationship between the physician and the patient is unique.In few other professional relationships is there such immediate intimacy and trust.Indeed, in an initial medical encounter involving the meeting of two strangers, often there are revelations about highly personal subjects and an examination of the patient's body.Patients and physicians deal with a staggering variety of issues as diverse as the drama of life-threatening assaults on health to more mundane concerns such as medication adjustment for the treatment of a chronic disease.Some of the goals of studying physician-patient communication include the desire to better understand how a relationship develops, to unearth the multiple levels of meaning in the medical encounter, and to better comprehend the effects of this complex interaction on patient health outcomes.Social scientists and physicians have studied the physician-patient relationship over the last 35 years.During this period of time, researchers have documented the significant influence of the physician-patient relationship on patient adherence, patient satisfaction, and patient health status.*In recent years, physicians also have begun to study the effects *References 4 6 , 14, 24, 31, 36-38, 40, 43, 45, 47-49, 52, 56.Also see articles by Roter and Stewart et a1 in this issue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication Patterns of Primary Care Physicians
Roter, D. L. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540280088045 · Cited by 939
Cited by
Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review
Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.304 · Cited by 2,002
Self-citationInteracting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior
Arora, N. K. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5 · Cited by 661
Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?
Davis, R. E., Jacklin, R., Sevdalis, N., & Vincent, C. A. (2007) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x · Cited by 432
Rose, J. H. (2008) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s1262 · Cited by 48
Welzel, F. D., Bär, J., Stein, J., Löbner, M., Pabst, A., Luppa, M., Grochtdreis, T., Kersting, A., Blüher, M., Luck-Sikorski, C., et al. (2021) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01404-0 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Adelman, R. D., Greene, M. G., & Ory, M. G.
- Venue
- Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0749-0690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970243751
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70004-5
- The paper
- Adelman, R. D., Greene, M. G., & Ory, M. G. (2000). COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER PATIENTS AND THEIR PHYSICIANS. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70004-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.