Cited by 596Nursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women

Lee, Sunmin, Colditz, Graham A, Berkman, Lisa F, Kawachi, Ichiro·2003·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background A growing number of women provide care to disabled or ill relatives. Many studies have linked caregiving to psychiatric morbidity, lower perceived health status, elevated blood pressure, and poorer immune function. However, no studies have examined the association between caregiving and cardiovascular disease incidence.Methods We conducted the study in 54,412 women from the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort of female registered nurses residing in 11 U.S. states. These women were aged 46 to 71 years and did not have diagnosed coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or cancer at baseline (1992). We collected information on caregiving responsibilities in 1992 and coronary heart disease between baseline (June 1, 1992) and return of the 1996 questionnaire.Results During 4 years of follow-up, we documented 321 incident cases of CHD (231 nonfatal cases of myocardial infarction and 90 CHD deaths). In multivariate analyses controlling for age, smoking, exercise, alcohol intake, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and other covariates, caregiving for disabled or ill spouse for > or =9 hours per week was associated with increased risk of CHD (RR, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.05). However, caregiving for disabled or ill parents or disabled or ill others was not significantly associated with increased risks of CHD.Conclusion These data indicate that high levels of caregiving burden for ill spouses may increase the risk of CHD among women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00582-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 596

Authors
Lee, S., Colditz, G. A., Berkman, L. F., & Kawachi, I.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
113-119
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W28539586
Cited by
596
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
FWCI
47.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag012806-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG-12806)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA087969)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
caregiver burden, coronary artery disease, women, family caregivers, spousal caregiving, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk, Nurses' Health Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Physiological, United States, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review