Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women
Abstract
Background A growing number of women provide care to disabled or ill relatives. Many studies have linked caregiving to psychiatric morbidity, lower perceived health status, elevated blood pressure, and poorer immune function. However, no studies have examined the association between caregiving and cardiovascular disease incidence.Methods We conducted the study in 54,412 women from the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort of female registered nurses residing in 11 U.S. states. These women were aged 46 to 71 years and did not have diagnosed coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, or cancer at baseline (1992). We collected information on caregiving responsibilities in 1992 and coronary heart disease between baseline (June 1, 1992) and return of the 1996 questionnaire.Results During 4 years of follow-up, we documented 321 incident cases of CHD (231 nonfatal cases of myocardial infarction and 90 CHD deaths). In multivariate analyses controlling for age, smoking, exercise, alcohol intake, body mass index, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and other covariates, caregiving for disabled or ill spouse for > or =9 hours per week was associated with increased risk of CHD (RR, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.05). However, caregiving for disabled or ill parents or disabled or ill others was not significantly associated with increased risks of CHD.Conclusion These data indicate that high levels of caregiving burden for ill spouses may increase the risk of CHD among women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregiving for a spouse with Alzheimer is associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk.
“Or the situation of caregiving for a spouse with Alzheimer, which is associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk (Lee et al., 2003)”
From Exposed to events that never happen: generalized unsafety, the default stress response, and prolonged autonomic activity (2017) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 596
- Authors
- Lee, S., Colditz, G. A., Berkman, L. F., & Kawachi, I.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-119
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W28539586
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 47.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag012806-04)
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG-12806)
- National Cancer Institute (P01CA087969)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- caregiver burden, coronary artery disease, women, family caregivers, spousal caregiving, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk, Nurses' Health Study
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Physiological, United States, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Caregivers, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review