The benefits of strength training for older adults
Abstract
Aging is associated with a number of physiologic and functional declines that can contribute to increased disability, frailty, and falls. Contributing factors are the loss of muscle mass and strength as age increases, a phenomenon called sarcopenia. Sarcopenia can result or be exacerbated by certain chronic conditions, and can also increase the burden of chronic disease. Current research has demonstrated that strength-training exercises have the ability to combat weakness and frailty and their debilitating consequences. Done regularly (e.g., 2 to 3 days per week), these exercises build muscle strength and muscle mass and preserve bone density, independence, and vitality with age. In addition, strength training also has the ability to reduce the risk of osteoporosis and the signs and symptoms of numerous chronic diseases such as heart disease, arthritis, and type 2 diabetes, while also improving sleep and reducing depression. This paper reviews the current research on strength training and older adults, evaluating exercise protocols in a variety of populations. It is clear that a variety of strength-training prescriptions from highly controlled laboratory-based to minimally supervised home-based programs have the ability to elicit meaningful health benefits in older adults. The key challenges as this field of exercise science moves forward are to best identify the most appropriate strength-training recommendations for older adults and to greatly increase the access to safe and effective programs in a variety of settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exercise interventions such as RET or MET have been used as an effective method for improving muscle function and increasing muscle mass by stimulating muscle protein synthesis in older adults.
“Exercise interventions, such as resistance exercise training (RET) that is employed alone or comprises multicomponent exercise training (MET)—including aerobics, balance, and function tasks—have been used as an effective method for improving muscle function and increasing muscle mass by stimulating muscle protein synthesis in older adults [10,11,12,13,14].”
From Effects of Protein Supplementation Combined with Exercise Intervention on Frailty Indices, Body Composition, and Physical Function in Frail Older Adults (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 354
- Authors
- SEGUIN, R.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- SEGUIN, R
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-149
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995480133
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Keywords
- resistance training, older adults, sarcopenia, frailty, muscle strength, muscle mass, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, falls, chronic disease, exercise prescription, home-based exercise, sleep, depression
- MeSH terms
- Accidental Falls, Aged, Aging, Community Health Services, Environment, Forecasting, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review