Cited by 354Nutrition and Health in AgingPhysical Activity and HealthFrailty in Older Adults

The benefits of strength training for older adults

SEGUIN, R·2003·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Aging is associated with a number of physiologic and functional declines that can contribute to increased disability, frailty, and falls. Contributing factors are the loss of muscle mass and strength as age increases, a phenomenon called sarcopenia. Sarcopenia can result or be exacerbated by certain chronic conditions, and can also increase the burden of chronic disease. Current research has demonstrated that strength-training exercises have the ability to combat weakness and frailty and their debilitating consequences. Done regularly (e.g., 2 to 3 days per week), these exercises build muscle strength and muscle mass and preserve bone density, independence, and vitality with age. In addition, strength training also has the ability to reduce the risk of osteoporosis and the signs and symptoms of numerous chronic diseases such as heart disease, arthritis, and type 2 diabetes, while also improving sleep and reducing depression. This paper reviews the current research on strength training and older adults, evaluating exercise protocols in a variety of populations. It is clear that a variety of strength-training prescriptions from highly controlled laboratory-based to minimally supervised home-based programs have the ability to elicit meaningful health benefits in older adults. The key challenges as this field of exercise science moves forward are to best identify the most appropriate strength-training recommendations for older adults and to greatly increase the access to safe and effective programs in a variety of settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00177-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise interventions such as RET or MET have been used as an effective method for improving muscle function and increasing muscle mass by stimulating muscle protein synthesis in older adults.

    “Exercise interventions, such as resistance exercise training (RET) that is employed alone or comprises multicomponent exercise training (MET)—including aerobics, balance, and function tasks—have been used as an effective method for improving muscle function and increasing muscle mass by stimulating muscle protein synthesis in older adults [10,11,12,13,14].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 354

Authors
SEGUIN, R.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
SEGUIN, R
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
141-149
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995480133
Cited by
354
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
resistance training, older adults, sarcopenia, frailty, muscle strength, muscle mass, bone mineral density, osteoporosis, falls, chronic disease, exercise prescription, home-based exercise, sleep, depression
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aging, Community Health Services, Environment, Forecasting, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review