The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consumer Product–Related Injuries in Athens, Ohio, 1980–85: Assessment of Emergency Room–Based Surveillance
Abstract
Using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System of the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, I computed the average annual rates per 1,000 population of consumer product-related injuries in residents of Athens County, Ohio, and seem at one hospital. These rates do not include intentional injuries or injuries to occupants of motor vehicles, to pedestrians hit by motor vehicles, or those occurring on the job or in house fires. Average annual rates for all injuries combined ranged from 102 per 1,000 boys 10-14 years of age to 11.7 per 1.000 men 65-74 years of age. For all males, the annual rate was 53 per 1,000 and for all females, 32 per 1,000. The most common parts of the body injured were the fingers (accounting for 15% of visits), face (12%), ankle (8.5%), hands (8%), and head (7.9%). The most common injury types were lacerations (33%), contusions and abrasions (22%), sprains (16%), and fractures (13%). Hospital admission rates varied by age, sex, type of injury, and part of body injured. Comparison of a sample of NEISS records to emergency room records showed that data were abstracted by clerical personnel with a high degree of accuracy. Review of fractures of the lower leg identified a cluster of injuries in young girls from playground merry-go-rounds. Review of burn injuries identified problems with scald injuries in young adult women and with eye injuries from welding in young men. The system can be used to evaluate injury control measures taken on a…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However two studies have demonstrated over 90% accuracy [26, 27].”
From The demographics of dog bites in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1989, 38, 27
- Graitcer, 1987, The development of state and local injury surveillance systems, J Safety Res, 18, 191, 10.1016/0022-4375(87)90082-X · DOI
- Runyan, 1985, Childhood injuries in North Carolina: a statewide analysis of hospitalizations and deaths, Am J Public Health, 75, 1429, 10.2105/AJPH.75.12.1429 · DOI
- Barancik, 1983, Northeastern Ohio Trauma Study. I. Magnitude of the problem, Am J Public Health, 73, 746, 10.2105/AJPH.73.7.746 · DOI
- McKay, 1979, A comparison of age-specific burn injury rates in five Massachusetts communities, Am J Public Health, 69, 1146, 10.2105/AJPH.69.11.1146 · DOI
- Stallones, 1961, Epidemiology of childhood accidents in two California counties, Public Health Rep, 76, 25, 10.2307/4591054 · DOI
- Gallegher, 1984, The incidence of injuries among 87,000 Massachusetts children and adolescents : results of the 1980-81 Statewide Childhood Injury Prevention Program Surveillance System, Am J Public Health, 74, 1340, 10.2105/AJPH.74.12.1340 · DOI
- Fife, 1984, Northeastern Ohio Trauma Study, II. Injury rates by age, sex and cause. Am J Public Health., 74, 473
- Thacker, 1988, A method to evaluate systems of epidemiologic surveillance, World Health Stat Q, 41, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The demographics of dog bites in the United States
Loder, R. T. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01360 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkins, R. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-112
- ISSN
- 0749-3797
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review