Cited by 219Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Revascularization and ligamentization of autogenous anterior cruciate ligament grafts in humans

Falconiero, RP, DiStefano, VJ, Cook, TM·1998·Arthroscopy

Abstract

Forty‐eight patients were enrolled in a study to determine the time interval for maturity and remodeling following arthroscopically assisted autogenous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Two biopsy specimens, one superficial and one deep, at the same level in the midsubstance of the ACL were obtained. Graft age, time from ACL reconstruction to biopsy, ranged from 3 months to 120 months. The patients were placed into four groups, (1) 3 to 6 months, (2) 7 to 12 months, (3) more than 12 months, and (4) control, in accordance with the time following ACL reconstruction. Each specimen was independently evaluated using light microscopy by two different observers in a blinded design. The biopsy specimens were evaluated for vascularity, cellularity, fiber pattern, and metaplasia when compared with the normal ACL. None of the patients was protected from activity as a result of ligament biopsy and no adverse outcomes were reported as a result of biopsy. Our study showed that fiber pattern, cellularity, vascularity, and degree of metaplasia obtained gross histological similarity with a normal ACL by 12 months after autogenous reconstruction. Unexpectedly, no significant statistical differences were noted for all grafts more than 6 months after ACLR, for two of the histological features studied, vascularity and fiber pattern, P =.05. We conclude that by 12 months after autogenous ACLR, graft maturity resembles a normal ACL. Additionally, because no statistical differences were noted in vascularity and fiber pattern after 6 months following autogenous ACLR, significant graft maturity may occur before 12 months. This may allow early postoperative return to full activity and support proponents of accelerated rehabilitation programs following autogenous ACLR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70041-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falconiero, R., DiStefano, V., & Cook, T.
Affiliations
South Jersey Sports Medicine Center Turnersville New Jersey 08012 USA
Venue
Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
197-205
ISSN
  • 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-3231
OpenAlex
W2030176917
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, autograft, graft maturation, graft remodeling, graft vascularity, metaplasia, cellularity, accelerated rehabilitation, return to activity
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Arthroscopy, Biopsy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Knee Injuries, Male, Tendons, Time Factors, Transplantation, Autologous, Case-Control Studies, Anterior Cruciate Ligament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review