Defensive strategies: the formation and social implications of patterned self-destructive behavior.
Abstract
When individuals routinely lack access to interactions that build emotional energy (EE), they use indirect routes to maximize EE. They build strategies around attempting to minimize the loss of EE. I refer to these indirect routes as defensive strategies. Defensive strategies reflect what psychologists refer to as an internal locus of control – placing control over one’s circumstances within one’s self rather than outside in one’s environment. While an internal locus of control may help an individual to adapt to their current situation, it also helps to preserve the status quo. I focus on the case of staying with an abusive domestic partner as an illustration of the social dynamics that underlie apparently self-destructive behavior and the preservation of abusive interaction patterns, including: the formation of defensive strategies, the emotional and cognitive implications of relying on defensive strategies, the situations that are likely to lead to the cessation of defensive strategies in favor of proactive strategies, and the social implications of defensive strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women in violent relationships often feel trapped and over-regulated and are more susceptible to suicidality.
“For example, we know that women in violent relationships often feel trapped and over-regulated (Summers-Effler, 2004); and are more susceptible to suicidality (Chang, 1996).”
From The Social Roots of Suicide: Theorizing How the External Social World Matters to Suicide and Suicide Prevention (2021) · cites this paper as Summers-Effler, 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Summers-Effler, E.
- Venue
- Advances in group processes
- Publisher
- Emerald (MCB UP )
- Published
- 2004-07-02
- Pages
- 309-325
- ISSN
- 0882-6145 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2492111950
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in group processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- defense strategy, self-destructive behavior, emotional energy, internal locus of control, abusive relationships, domestic violence, proactive strategy, social dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review