On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific perception: The developmental manifold concept
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evolved nest is organized to meet the basic needs of the young as they mature.
“Like every animal’s developmental system, the evolved nest is organized to meet the basic needs of the young as they mature (Gottlieb, 2002).”
From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Gottlieb, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Gottlieb, G.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gottlieb, Gilbert
- Venue
- Cognitive Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 1287-1300
- ISSN
- 0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171375880
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cognitive Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- epigenetic evolution, natural selection, developmental history, ducklings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
