The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea
Abstract
PURPOSE: (1). To investigate the distribution of anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs, 3rd to 6th orders) in the population; (2). to evaluate the symmetry of anterior corneal aberrations between right and left eyes of individuals; and (3). to study the variations in anterior corneal aberrations with aging. SETTING: Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. METHODS: Using the CTView program (Sarver and Associates, Inc.), corneal HOAs were computed from the central 6.0 mm zone of the corneal topographic maps (Humphrey Atlas, Carl Zeiss, Inc.) of 228 eyes of 134 subjects (mean age 50 years +/- 17 (SD); range 20 to 79 years; manifest spherical equivalent between -3.0 and +3.0 diopters [D]). Correlation analysis was performed to investigate the aberration symmetry between the right and left eyes and to assess the association between anterior corneal HOAs and age. RESULTS: There was wide individual variability in aberrations with ranges of individual Zernike terms from -0.579 to +0.572 microm. The mean coefficient of the 4th-order spherical aberration (SA) (Z(4)(0)) was 0.280 +/- 0.086 microm and was positive in all corneas. The mean root-mean-square (RMS) values were 0.479 +/- 0.124 microm for HOA, 0.281 +/- 0.086 microm for SA (Z(4)(0)and Z(6)(0)), and 0.248 +/- 0.135 microm for coma (Z(3)(-1), Z(3)(1), Z(5)(-1), and Z(5)(1)). Moderate to high correlations were found between right and left eyes for HOA, SA, and coma (Pearson r = 0.565, 0.751, and 0.565, respectively; all P<.001); 8 of the 9 Zernike terms in the 3rd and 4th orders were significantly correlated between eyes (Bonferroni correction P'<.05/22). Higher-order aberration RMS and coma RMS increased with aging (r = 0.434 and 0.290, respectively; both P<.001); SA RMS was not correlated with change in age (r = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Anterior corneal wavefront aberrations varied greatly among subjects and increased slightly with aging. All corneas had positive 4th-order SAs, and the values did not change with aging. A moderate to high degree of mirror symmetry existed between right and left eyes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes
Atchison, D. A., Markwell, E. L., Kasthurirangan, S., Pope, J. M., Smith, G., & Swann, P. G. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.4.29 · Cited by 270
Comparison of visual performance with an aspheric intraocular lens and a spherical intraocular lens
Thiagarajan, M., McClenaghan, R., & Anderson, D. F. (2011) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.046 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Dai, E., Koch, D. D., & Nathoo, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1514-1521
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W1993400116
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00467-x
- The paper
- Wang, L., Dai, E., Koch, D. D., & Nathoo, A. (2003). Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00467-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.