The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of refractive live-epikeratophakia (L-EPI) for early keratoconus to cap, rather than reverse, the ectatic cornea. SETTING: Eye Department, Martin-Luther-Hospital, Bochum, Germany. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive cases with keratoconus stage I-II had L-EPI. Lenticules were obtained from eye-bank eyes. The lenticules were cut on the artificial anterior chamber bench of the Barraquer-Krumeich-Swinger set. Optical power was generated over refractive dies to achieve postoperative emmetropia. The lenticule was sutured into a peripherally undermined 7.0 mm trephination with a double-running torque suture. RESULTS: Re-epithelialization was complete within 4 to 6 days. In all but three cases that had corneal ulcers and experienced partial melting of tissue following severe neurodermatitis, all lenticules remained stable during the 10 year follow-up. The 1 month spherical equivalent remained almost stable over the entire follow-up. There was no sign of progression of keratoconus as induced myopia or astigmatism indicated by keratometry readings. Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.45 (n = 27) preoperatively and 0.19 (n = 25) at 1 week, 0.39 (n = 26) at 1 month, 0.53 (n = 20) at 6 months, 0.58 (n = 13) at 1 year, and 0.64 (n = 8) at 2 years. Preoperative BCVA was achieved or improved in 13 eyes at 1 month. Postoperative astigmatism was < or = 3.25 diopters. Neither rejection nor lenticule opacification was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Live-epikeratophakia is a safe and minimally invasive extraocular procedure suitable for keratoconus stage I-II. Progression of keratoconus may be arrested. If unsuccessful, the procedure is complementable and there is no interference with a later penetrating keratoplasty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Novel Pachymetric Parameters Based on Corneal Tomography for Diagnosing Keratoconus
Ambrósio, R., Caiado, A. L. C., Guerra, F. P., Louzada, R., Roy, A. S., Luz, A., Dupps, W. J., & Belin, M. W. (2011) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20110721-01 · Cited by 349
Enrichment of pathogenic alleles in the brittle cornea gene, ZNF469, in keratoconus
Lechner, J., Porter, L. F., Rice, A., Vitart, V., Armstrong, D. J., Schorderet, D. F., Munier, F. L., Wright, A. F., Inglehearn, C. F., Black, G. C., et al. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu253 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Krumeich, J. H., Daniel, J., & Knülle, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 456-463
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2010090512
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80284-8
- The paper
- Krumeich, J. H., Daniel, J., & Knülle, A. (1998). Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80284-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.