Injury severity, prior trauma history, urinary cortisol levels, and acute PTSD in motor vehicle accident victims
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between prior history of traumatic events, life threat, and injury severity experienced during a motor vehicle accident (MVA), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed 1 month after the accident. In addition, initial urinary cortisol levels after the accident were examined as a possible mediator of this relationship. Fifteen-hour urinary cortisol samples were collected from MVA victims upon admission to the trauma unit. In the hospital, subjective life threat was measured and objective Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) were computed. One month after the accident, participants were assessed for prior history of traumatic experiences, presence of acute PTSD, and levels of intrusive and avoidant thoughts and behaviors. Victims, who met PTSD diagnostic criteria, reported more prior traumatic events, and significantly greater life threat despite receiving significantly lower ISSs than victims who did not develop PTSD. The relationships between ISSs and PTSD symptoms and prior trauma history and PTSD symptoms were mediated by cortisol levels. Results suggest that cortisol levels in the acute aftermath of a traumatic event may serve as a mechanism through which various factors may increase risk for PTSD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher objective injury severity scores due to a potential traumatic event do not predict later PTSD symptoms.
“In addition, it has been reported that higher objective injury severity scores due to a potential traumatic event do not predict later PTSD symptoms [100].”
From Efficacy of oxytocin administration early after psychotrauma in preventing the development of PTSD: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2014) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Delahanty, D. L., Raimonde, A. J., Spoonster, E., & Cullado, M.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- Summa Health System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Delahanty, Douglas L
- ORCID
- Delahanty, Douglas L
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-164
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991218534
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062042, R01 MH62042-01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, motor vehicle accidents, injury severity, urinary cortisol, threat to life, intrusive thoughts, avoidance behavior, trauma risk factors, mediation
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Injury Severity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review