A randomized effectiveness trial of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for depressed adolescents receiving antidepressant medication
Abstract
Objective To test a collaborative-care, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program adjunctive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment in HMO pediatric primary care. Method A randomized effectiveness trial comparing a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition consisting primarily of SSRI medication delivered outside the experimental protocol (n = 75) versus TAU SSRI plus brief CBT (n = 77). Participants were identified by a recent dispense of SSRI medication followed by telephone screening. Adolescents with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (n = 152) were enrolled. The CBT program employed cognitive restructuring and/or behavioral activation training. Therapists consulted with prescribing pediatricians to improve medication adherence. Results Through 1-year follow-up, the authors found CBT advantages on the Short Form-12 Mental Component Scale (p = .04), reductions in TAU outpatient visits (p = .02), and days' supply of all medications (p = .01). No effects were detected for major depressive disorder episodes; a nonsignificant trend favoring CBT was detected on the Center for Epidemiology Depression Scale (p = .07). Conclusions The authors detected a weak CBT effect, possibly rendered less significant by the small sample and likely attenuated by the unexpected reduction in SSRI pharmacotherapy in the CBT condition. Small, incremental improvements over monotherapy, such as observed in this study, most likely represent the new norm in adolescent depres…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been inconsistent findings regarding the combined use of SSRIs and CBT with adolescents.
“Further, there have been inconsistent findings regarding the combined use of SSRIs and CBT with adolescents (Clarke 2005; Goodyer 2007; March 2004; Melvin 2006).”
From Interventions for preventing relapse and recurrence of a depressive disorder in children and adolescents (2012) · cites this paper as Clarke 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- Clarke, G., Debar, L., Lynch, F., Powell, J., Gale, J., O'Connor, E., Ludman, E., Bush, T., Lin, E. H. B., & Korff, M. V.
- Affiliations
- Group Health Cooperative (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clarke, Gregory
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 888-898
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092701739
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 18.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, brief psychotherapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, adjunctive therapy, collaborative care, pediatric primary care, medication adherence, cognitive restructuring, behavioral activation, health maintenance organizations
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Algorithms, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review