The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Importance of Sodium Pyruvate in Assessing Damage Produced by Hydrogen Peroxide
Open accessAbstract
Instability of hydrogen peroxide solutions was noted during the experimental exposure of human cells in culture to hydrogen peroxide in experiments designed to study the production and repair of DNA single-strand breaks. A hydrogen peroxide concentrate was diluted into culture medium, which was then added to experimental cell cultures at various times, with all cultures assessed for DNA damage at 2 h. Only cells treated by the first addition had observable DNA damage. This result was unexpected since these cells had had the maximum repair time. It was determined that the hydrogen peroxide had been eliminated by the culture medium. To determine the mechanism of this elimination, 200 microM hydrogen peroxide was added to various cell culture components, and the solutions were assayed for hydrogen peroxide after 1 h at 37 degrees C. Although most components (except the balanced salts) showed some hydrogen peroxide degradation, it was found that sodium pyruvate was most effective, by a wide margin, in eliminating hydrogen peroxide and its toxic effects. This was confirmed by addition of pyruvate to balanced salt solutions or buffers, and observing the same elimination of hydrogen peroxide. We subsequently found a few earlier reports describing the decarboxylation reaction between hydrogen peroxide and pyruvate, but no kinetic measurements have been published and there seems to be no general appreciation for the very high efficiency of this reaction. The present work presents a preliminary assessment of the importance of pyruvate in the study of hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species in mammalian cell culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ascorbic acid: Chemistry, biology and the treatment of cancer
Du, J., Cullen, J. J., & Buettner, G. R. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,070
Liszkay, A., Kenk, B., & Schopfer, P. (2003) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-003-1028-1 · Cited by 310
Ahmado, A., Carr, A.-J., Vugler, A. A., Semo, M., Gias, C., Lawrence, J. M., Chen, L. L., Chen, F. K., Turowski, P., da Cruz, L., et al. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6374 · Cited by 100
Ryu, J. K., Kim, S. U., & McLarnon, J. G. (2004) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.01.006 · Cited by 62
Gledhill, K., Rhodes, L. E., Brownrigg, M., Haylett, A. K., Masoodi, M., Thody, A. J., Nicolaou, A., & Tobin, D. J. (2010) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-148x.2010.00696.x · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Giandomenico, A. R., Cerniglia, G. E., Biaglow, J. E., Stevens, C. W., & Koch, C. J.
- Venue
- Free Radical Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-434
- ISSN
- 0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051628950
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of Sodium Pyruvate in Assessing Damage Produced by Hydrogen Peroxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00113-5
- The paper
- Giandomenico, A. R., Cerniglia, G. E., Biaglow, J. E., Stevens, C. W., & Koch, C. J. (1997). The Importance of Sodium Pyruvate in Assessing Damage Produced by Hydrogen Peroxide. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00113-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.