Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We view selection as most closely related to the gating mechanism of traditional RNNs, which is a special case and also has a deeper history of connections to SSMs through variable discretization of Delta.
“Instead, we view it as most closely related to the gating mechanism of traditional RNNs, which is a special case (Theorem 1) and also has a deeper history of connections to SSMs through variable (input-dependent) discretization of Δ (Funahashi and Nakamura 1993; Gu, Dao, et al. 2020; Tallec and Ollivier 2018).”
From Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces (2023) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura 1993
An artificial neural network model with recurrent connections can approximate any dynamical systems.
“An artificial neural network model with recurrent connections is known to be able to approximate any dynamical systems (Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993), so it is appropriate to model a neural process that evolves over a period such as a production of a motor sequence.”
From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993
Recurrent connections in a neural network provide computational flexibility to model a dynamical system but cause a chaotic instability due to dependence on previous activities and random noises.
“Recurrent connections in a neural network provide computational flexibility to model a dynamical system (Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993) but cause a chaotic instability due to dependence on previous activities and random noises (Sompolinsky et al., 1988).”
From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication
Jaeger, H., & Haas, H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091277 · Cited by 3,811 · see citing works
Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training
Lukoševičius, M., & Jaeger, H. (2009) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.005 · Cited by 2,956 · see citing works
Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894 · see citing works
Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00752 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning
Floreano, D., Dürr, P., & Mattiussi, C. (2008) · Evolutionary Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s12065-007-0002-4 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Clustering-Based Speech Emotion Recognition by Incorporating Learned Features and Deep BiLSTM
Mustaqeem, Sajjad, M., & Kwon, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990405 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Song, H. F., Yang, G. R., & Wang, X.-J. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004792 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformers
Tang, Y., Han, K., Wang, Y., Xu, C., Guo, J., Xu, C., & Tao, D. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01185 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Current trends in the development of intelligent unmanned autonomous systems
Zhang, T., Li, Q., Zhang, C.-S., Liang, H.-W., Li, P., Wang, T.-M., Li, S., Zhu, Y.-L., & Wu, C. (2017) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1601650 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review
Tanaka, H., Ishikawa, T., Lee, J., & Kakei, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2020.00019 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Kumar, R., Srivastava, S., & Gupta, J. R. P. (2017) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.022 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Golan, T., Taylor, J., Schütt, H., Peters, B., Sommers, R. P., Seeliger, K., Doerig, A., Linton, P., Konkle, T., van Gerven, M., et al. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23001553 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Funahashi, K.-I., & Nakamura, Y.
- Affiliations
- Toyohashi University of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Funahashi, Ken-ichi
- ORCID
- Nakamura, Yuichi
- Venue
- Neural Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 801-806
- ISSN
- 0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058580716
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
- Keywords
- continuous-time recurrent neural networks, dynamical systems, trajectory approximation, continuous curves, initial conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review