Cited by 980Neural Networks and ApplicationsNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks

Funahashi, Ken-ichi, Nakamura, Yuichi·1993·Neural Networks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80125-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We view selection as most closely related to the gating mechanism of traditional RNNs, which is a special case and also has a deeper history of connections to SSMs through variable discretization of Delta.

    “Instead, we view it as most closely related to the gating mechanism of traditional RNNs, which is a special case (Theorem 1) and also has a deeper history of connections to SSMs through variable (input-dependent) discretization of Δ (Funahashi and Nakamura 1993; Gu, Dao, et al. 2020; Tallec and Ollivier 2018).”

    From Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces (2023) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura 1993

  • An artificial neural network model with recurrent connections can approximate any dynamical systems.

    “An artificial neural network model with recurrent connections is known to be able to approximate any dynamical systems (Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993), so it is appropriate to model a neural process that evolves over a period such as a production of a motor sequence.”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993

  • Recurrent connections in a neural network provide computational flexibility to model a dynamical system but cause a chaotic instability due to dependence on previous activities and random noises.

    “Recurrent connections in a neural network provide computational flexibility to model a dynamical system (Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993) but cause a chaotic instability due to dependence on previous activities and random noises (Sompolinsky et al., 1988).”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Funahashi and Nakamura, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Funahashi, K.-I., & Nakamura, Y.
Affiliations
Toyohashi University of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Funahashi, Ken-ichi
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
801-806
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058580716
Cited by
980
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
continuous-time recurrent neural networks, dynamical systems, trajectory approximation, continuous curves, initial conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review