The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adherence in AIDS clinical trials: A framework for clinical research and clinical care
Open accessAbstract
Assessment of adherence within AIDS clinical trials is a critical component of the successful evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. Poor medication adherence can result in the misinterpretation of clinical trial data. Research on factors affecting adherence in AIDS clinical trials has been scarce, and few investigations have evaluated strategies for enhancing patient participation. One reason may be the absence of a conceptual framework to guide research. Consistent with previous research on medical adherence, we propose a framework whereby factors affecting adherence in AIDS clinical trials can be categorized as characteristics of the: (a) individual, (b) treatment regimen, (c) patient-provider relationship, (d) clinical setting, and (e) disease. This framework is used as a heuristic for reviewing studies that examine factors affecting adherence in AIDS clinical trials. Suggestions for future research and clinical intervention are provided. These efforts are timely because adherence is now the center of attention in discourse about the efficacy of the new class of protease inhibitor drugs; non-adherence has been linked to viral resistance and drug failure. Efforts to identify factors that influence adherence to AIDS clinical trials can inform future attempts to improve adherence and retention. Better adherence protects the scientific integrity of AIDS clinical trials, promoting more efficient and accurate evaluations of therapeutic value. Accelerated access to new treatments may follow, ultimately enhancing patient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
Dybul, M., Fauci, A. S., Bartlett, J. G., Kaplan, J. E., & Pau, A. K. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_2-200209031-00001 · Cited by 482
Chander, G., Himelhoch, S., & Moore, R. D. (2006) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200666060-00004 · Cited by 379
Safren, S. A., W. Otto, M., Worth, J. L., Salomon, E., Johnson, W., Mayer, K., & Boswell, S. (2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00091-7 · Cited by 327
Rueda, S., Park-Wyllie, L. Y., Bayoumi, A., Tynan, A.-M., Antoniou, T., Rourke, S., & Glazier, R. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001442.pub2 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Ickovics, J. R., & Meisler, A. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-391
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094193485
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence in AIDS clinical trials: A framework for clinical research and clinical care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00041-3
- The paper
- Ickovics, J. R., & Meisler, A. W. (1997). Adherence in AIDS clinical trials: A framework for clinical research and clinical care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00041-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.