Postsynaptic Induction and PKA-Dependent Expression of LTP in the Lateral Amygdala
Open accessAbstract
Whereas much is now known about the behavioral importance of the lateral nucleus of the amygdala for the storage of implicit memories of fear, little is known in molecular terms about the signal transduction pathways required for long-term potentiation (LTP) in this nucleus. Using brain slices containing the amygdala, we have studied LTP in the pathway from external capsule to the lateral nucleus, a pathway that mediates information from the auditory cortex important for fear conditioning. We found the induction of LTP is postsynaptic; it is dependent on postsynaptic depolarization, on the influx of Ca2+ into the postsynaptic cell and, at least in part, on the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. The LTP is associated with a decrease of paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) and is blocked by bath application but not blocked by postsynaptic injection of inhibitors of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent (cAMP-dependent) protein kinase (PKA). Consistent with the possibility that the expression might involve PKA presynaptically, the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin induced synaptic potentiation of this pathway that also was associated with a decrease of PPF, and this potentiation occluded the tetanus-induced LTP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning.
“Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning (8–18).”
From Optical activation of lateral amygdala pyramidal cells instructs associative fear learning (2010) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 333
- Authors
- Huang, Y.-Y., & Kandel, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kandel, Eric R
- ORCID
- Kandel, Eric R
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-178
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979231658
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- long-term potentiation, lateral amygdala, protein kinase A, NMDA receptor, paired-pulse facilitation, forskolin, adenylate cyclase, tetanic potentiation, fear conditioning, auditory cortex, signal transduction, synaptic plasticity
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Calcium, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Glutamate, Long-Term Potentiation, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Rats, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review