Cited by 333Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Postsynaptic Induction and PKA-Dependent Expression of LTP in the Lateral Amygdala

Open access
Huang, Yan-You, Kandel, Eric R·1998·Neuron

Abstract

Whereas much is now known about the behavioral importance of the lateral nucleus of the amygdala for the storage of implicit memories of fear, little is known in molecular terms about the signal transduction pathways required for long-term potentiation (LTP) in this nucleus. Using brain slices containing the amygdala, we have studied LTP in the pathway from external capsule to the lateral nucleus, a pathway that mediates information from the auditory cortex important for fear conditioning. We found the induction of LTP is postsynaptic; it is dependent on postsynaptic depolarization, on the influx of Ca2+ into the postsynaptic cell and, at least in part, on the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. The LTP is associated with a decrease of paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) and is blocked by bath application but not blocked by postsynaptic injection of inhibitors of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent (cAMP-dependent) protein kinase (PKA). Consistent with the possibility that the expression might involve PKA presynaptically, the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin induced synaptic potentiation of this pathway that also was associated with a decrease of PPF, and this potentiation occluded the tetanus-induced LTP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80524-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning.

    “Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning (8–18).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 333

Authors
Huang, Y.-Y., & Kandel, E. R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kandel, Eric R
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
169-178
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979231658
Cited by
333
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
long-term potentiation, lateral amygdala, protein kinase A, NMDA receptor, paired-pulse facilitation, forskolin, adenylate cyclase, tetanic potentiation, fear conditioning, auditory cortex, signal transduction, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Calcium, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Glutamate, Long-Term Potentiation, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review