The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bayesian belief propagation and particle filtering are the most successful computer vision algorithms to date.
“Bayesian belief propagation 18 -20 and particle filtering 21,22 are the most successful computer vision algorithms to date.”
From Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex (2003) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 721 · Cited by 541
- Authors
- Gray, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Charles M.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-47
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066877541
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 721
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- visual feature integration, binding problem, cell assemblies, Gestalt grouping, object recognition, object-based attention, distributed neural representation, cortical networks, neuronal synchronization
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurons, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Signal Transduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review