The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and aggregation plays a significant role in extracting useful information from data and communicating it to stakeholders as a sole measure [35].”
From Sustainability Reporting and Performance Measurement Systems: How do Small- and Medium-Sized Benefit Corporations Manage Integration? (2018) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Catalytic Conversion of Carbohydrates to Initial Platform Chemicals: Chemistry and Sustainability
Mika, L. T., Cséfalvay, E., & Németh, Á. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00395 · Cited by 1,342
An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2011) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007 · Cited by 1,343
A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162 · Cited by 898
The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: A systematic literature review
Jia, F., Yin, S., Chen, L., & Chen, X. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120728 · Cited by 744
When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators
Gan, X., Fernández, I. C., Guo, J., Wilson, M. C., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., & Wu, J. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- KRAJNC, D., & GLAVIC, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Maribor (SI)
- ORCID
- KRAJNC, D
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-208
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4250342185
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- sustainability indicators, composite sustainability index, corporate sustainability performance, integrated assessment models, analytic hierarchy process, Global Reporting Initiative, corporate decision-making, Henkel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
