On the development of superconducting tunnel junctions as photon counting spectrometers for application in astrophysics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inflation predicts a Gaussian random field of density fluctuations, but this is not unique to inflation because of the central limit theorem.
“Inflation predicts a Gaussian random field of density fluctuations, but thanks to the central limit theorem this isn't particularly unique (Peacock 1999, p. 342, 503).”
From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock 1999
I4 is non-trivial: the inflaton potential must have a region where the slow-roll approximation does not hold; if the inflaton rolls into a local minimum while the SRA still holds, inflation never ends.
“I4 is non-trivial.The inflaton potential (or, more specifically, the region of the inflaton potential which actually determines the evolution of the field) must have a region in which the slow-roll approximation does not hold.If the inflaton rolls into a local minimum (at f 0 ) while the SRA still holds (which requires V(f 0 ) c m Pl 2 / 8p d 2 V/df 2 9 f 0 Peacock 1999, p. 332), then inflation”
From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock 1999
Requirement I3 comes rather naturally to inflation: Peacock (1999) shows that requiring inflation to produce a large number of e-folds is essentially the same as requiring inflation to happen, namely f_start much greater than m_Pl.
“Requirement I3 comes rather naturally to inflation: Peacock (1999, p. 337) shows that the requirement that inflation produce a large number of e-folds is essentially the same as the requirement that inflation happen in the first place (i.e.SRA), namely f start c m Pl .”
From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock (1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life
Barnes, L. A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12015 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“For initial 14 These requirements can be found in any good cosmology textbook, e.g. Peacock (1999); Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010). conditions, Tegmark ‘sprays starting points randomly across the potential surface’.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Peacock, A.
- Affiliations
- European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Peacock, A
- ORCID
- Peacock, A
- Venue
- Physica B: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 263-264
- Pages
- 595-603
- ISSN
- 0921-4526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086857794
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physica B Condensed Matter (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Keywords
- superconducting tunnel junctions, astronomical spectroscopy, hafnium, infrared detectors, detector arrays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review