Cited by 28Superconducting and THz Device TechnologyAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchParticle Detector Development and Performance

On the development of superconducting tunnel junctions as photon counting spectrometers for application in astrophysics

Peacock, A·1999·Physica B: Condensed Matter

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0921-4526(98)01260-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inflation predicts a Gaussian random field of density fluctuations, but this is not unique to inflation because of the central limit theorem.

    “Inflation predicts a Gaussian random field of density fluctuations, but thanks to the central limit theorem this isn't particularly unique (Peacock 1999, p. 342, 503).”

    From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock 1999

  • I4 is non-trivial: the inflaton potential must have a region where the slow-roll approximation does not hold; if the inflaton rolls into a local minimum while the SRA still holds, inflation never ends.

    “I4 is non-trivial.The inflaton potential (or, more specifically, the region of the inflaton potential which actually determines the evolution of the field) must have a region in which the slow-roll approximation does not hold.If the inflaton rolls into a local minimum (at f 0 ) while the SRA still holds (which requires V(f 0 ) c m Pl 2 / 8p d 2 V/df 2 9 f 0 Peacock 1999, p. 332), then inflation”

    From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock 1999

  • Requirement I3 comes rather naturally to inflation: Peacock (1999) shows that requiring inflation to produce a large number of e-folds is essentially the same as requiring inflation to happen, namely f_start much greater than m_Pl.

    “Requirement I3 comes rather naturally to inflation: Peacock (1999, p. 337) shows that the requirement that inflation produce a large number of e-folds is essentially the same as the requirement that inflation happen in the first place (i.e.SRA), namely f start c m Pl .”

    From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Peacock (1999)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life

    Barnes, L. A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12015 · Cited by 150 · see citing works

    “For initial 14 These requirements can be found in any good cosmology textbook, e.g. Peacock (1999); Mo, van den Bosch & White (2010). conditions, Tegmark ‘sprays starting points randomly across the potential surface’.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Authors
Peacock, A.
Affiliations
European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Peacock, A
Venue
Physica B: Condensed Matter
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
263-264
Pages
595-603
ISSN
0921-4526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086857794
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physica B Condensed Matter (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle Detector Development and Performance
Keywords
superconducting tunnel junctions, astronomical spectroscopy, hafnium, infrared detectors, detector arrays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review