The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Cited by
Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement
Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007 · Cited by 494
Current role of social benefits in ecosystem service assessments
Schmidt, K., Sachse, R., & Walz, A. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.005 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., & van Vliet, A.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 187-204
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115784325
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00273-2
- The paper
- De Groot, R., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A., & van Vliet, A. (2003). Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00273-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
