The DOI matches its Crossref record.
P.2.f.013 Clinical evidence for improvement in cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) after treatment with vortioxetine
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Exploratory and post hoc analyses provided further support that vortioxetine improves cognitive functioning in subjects with MDD.
“In addition, exploratory and post hoc analyses provided further support of the hypothesis that vortioxetine improves cognitive functioning in subjects with MDD (Keefe et al, 2013b).”
From A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Reference, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Keefe et al, 2013b
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mahableshwarkar, A. R., Zajecka, J., Jacobson, W., Chen, Y., & Keefe, R. S. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.52 · Cited by 307
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Keefe, R. S. E., Mahableshwarkar, A. R., & Olsen, C. K.
- Venue
- European Neuropsychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- S402-S403
- ISSN
- 0924-977X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334974379
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- vortioxetine, major depressive disorder, cognitive impairment, antidepressant treatment outcome, prognostic factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
